64 Is it enough: An Assessment of Parental Satisfaction with an International Adoption Clinic at a Pediatric Tertiary Care Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background The circumstance in which internationally adopted children are born and live prior to adoption put them at high risk for health issues. Nearly all adoptees have complex medical conditions, the most common being cleft lip/palate, orthopaedic problems, infectious diseases, congenital heart diseases, and/or nutritional deficiencies, as well as cognitive impairments, and/or developmental delays. Specifically, nearly all institutionalized children will have expressive language delays and most will have motor delays. Although improvement can be seen with time, most do not attain their full potential. Additionally, by nature of adoption, all children experience trauma. In some situations, this will be further compounded by neglect and/or abuse faced prior to adoption, or during institutionalization. Consequently, almost all adoptees develop attachment difficulties. Trained medical professionals are required to screen, monitor, and provide management suggestions for this complex and unique population. Objectives To our knowledge, parental experience of an international adoption clinic has not yet been published. This parent-based evaluation of the parental experience at a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic, provides insights that may help guide provision of care for this high-risk population in our centre, throughout the country, and internationally. Design/Methods A qualitative, exploratory design was employed using telephone interviews of eighteen parents of adoptees assessed by a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic since 2010. This approach was chosen to allow for more extensive exploration of parental experience, and to identify barriers and facilitators of care. Interviews were 30 to 90 minutes, semi-structured, and transcribed verbatim. Field notes were made during the interviews to note intonation and major concerns, and were used to supplement transcripts during data analysis. Questions covered experiences with pre-adoption counselling, arranging the first clinic visit, health and developmental assessments, life after clinic discharge, and general comments/suggestions. Thematic analysis was performed on the transcripts using Maguire’s step-by-step guide. Results Analysis resulted in four main themes and seven subthemes. The first theme was “difficulty of international adoption”. The second theme “utility and impact of services offered” was subdivided into “pre-adoption counselling”, “clinic visits and medical assessments”, and “post adoption seminars”. The third theme “the administrative procedures of the clinic” was subdivided into “timing and ease of organizing a first visit”, and “hours of operation”. The final theme “gaps in care” was divided into “ongoing difficulty with attachment”, and “allied healthcare services”. These results demonstrate that parents of internationally adopted children often feel overwhelmed by the medical needs of their children and feel unsupported. They recommend comprehensive and in-person pre-adoption counselling with standard referral processes to ensure timely access to care. Post-arrival medical and developmental assessments should be flexible and complete. Most importantly, clinics should incorporate support from allied healthcare professionals, including social work, psychology, occupational therapy, and physiotherapy. In particular, parents were interested in further management of attachment. Conclusion This first parent-based evaluation of the parental experience at a pediatric tertiary care center’s international adoption clinic provides insights that may help guide provision of care to this high-risk population in centres across Canada and internationally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".