MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W306439780

Tackling Insurance Fraud: Law and Practice

2007· article· en· W306439780 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueRisk Management and Insurance Review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueLaw, logistics, and international trade
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInsurance lawReinsuranceLawInsurance fraudInsurance policyGeneral insuranceSuspectBad faithBusinessActuarial sciencePolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Tackling Insurance Fraud: Law and Practice, by Dexter Morse and Lynne Skajaa, Informa Professional, London, UK. This volume bills itself as one of a series of Practical Insurance Guides, along with others such as Insurance Disputes, Good Faith and Insurance, and Marine Insurance all with an emphasis on law. Informa Professional is the publisher of a London insurance daily Insurance Day and a purveyor of conferences (Reinsurance Summit 2006), training courses (none listed yet), and distance learning (masters degrees in various law fields, such as EU law, food law and employment law, and with various universities) as shown on their Website (www.informalaw.com). Informa's interests appear to be principally legal (247 products, 27 in insurance and banking, and 73 in maritime law). This volume fits into the insurance and banking law category. The authors are both accomplished lawyers in the UK, Dexter Morse with a reinsurer and Lynne Skajaa with several law firms dealing with maritime issues and with the University of Southampton. As you would suspect the book deals with insurance fraud with a decidedly legalistic point of view. Although the fraud coverage is primarily from a UK perspective, the authors present some universal concepts such as What is insurance fraud? and Who is the typical fraudster? and contrast the UK experience with the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and European efforts in some 34 of the book's 158 pages. You will not find theoretical models of behavior, with underlying subjective probabilistic models of outcomes favorable to the fraudsters, but you will find a discussion of both the problem of insurance fraud and details about the means of detection, deterrence, and prosecution, all in a readable and well sequenced set of chapters. Chapter 1 begins by exposing a worldwide problem for combating insurance fraud found also in the UK, namely, the absence of specific statutes that deal explicitly with insurance fraud. The authors cite relevant sections of the Theft Act of 1968, and subsequent case law that cover deception and dishonesty in obtaining property (claim settlement), in gaining a pecuniary advantage (policy coverage) and in falsifying accounts (large scale fraud). The Theft Act, updated in 1996 to include banking but not insurance transactions, provides the analogs to the use in the United States of larceny and mail fraud statutes to prosecute insurance fraud prior to recent state-by-state adoption of laws, some by line of insurance, specifying penalties for insurance fraud per se. case law and the Perjury Act of 1911 are also cited for their usefulness in rounding out the legal environment in the UK. Typical fraudsters are categorized in Chapter 2 into three categories: The average insured succumbing to what we call opportunistic the full or part-time criminal, and organized gangs, all motivated by greed, financial difficulty, or a sense of recovering premiums not paid out in claims. There does not seem to be a category that covers professional providers such as doctors and lawyers who facilitate fraud in the guise of legitimate claims2 or a category for those who create phony insurers or loot existing companies of their assets. Thus the focus of the book is the retail aspect of application and claim fraud. Chapter 3 reviews so-called fraud indicators, those yes-no objective and subjective statements about the circumstances surrounding the filing of a claim such as 'The insured is very knowledgeable about insurance terms and claims procedures. Such indicators may be specific to line of business, especially property or motor lines.3 Chapter 4 confronts the problem of separating criminal fraud from civil fraud, the latter being unethical practices, at least in someone's eyes, known colloquially as soft fraud. The authors properly view the distinction in terms of contract law and resolution of contract disputes. Chapters 5 and 6 apply the general legal analysis to their specific interests in marine and reinsurance lines of insurance. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,920
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,819

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle