112 Becoming parents again: the challenges of raising grandchildren as main caregiver
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background ‘Skipped generation households’ in which grandparents are the main caregiver to children under 18 years of age, are becoming common in Canada. Reasons for this include teen pregnancy, the death of a parent, mental illness and addictions. These grandparents and the grandchildren they care for are at significantly increased risk of physical and mental illness, yet receive less psychosocial and financial assistance compared to children that enter the foster system. Research on this population in Canada is limited. Objectives Our study aimed to use the lived experiences of skipped generation families to better identify their needs in the healthcare system. Design/Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews of grandparent primary caregivers from ten households in our community to chronicle their lived experiences raising their grandchildren. Participants were identified and recruited by general pediatricians using convenience sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded using Atlas.ti software and classified into themes by consensus. Results A total of 11 primary caregiver grandparents from 10 households participated in interviews. Nine participants were female. The average age of grandparents was 56 years (range 45 to 64 years) and on average they had been caring for their grandchild for 4 years (range 0.9 to 9 years). Eight households began caring for their grandchild following involvement of the Department of Community Services. Five primary themes emerged from the interviews: Changes in family dynamics, psychosocial impact on grandchild and grandparent, lack of resources for grandparent caregivers, challenges parenting later in life, and resilience inspired by the love of family. Many participants described feeling unsupported, both financially and emotionally, after assuming care of their grandchildren and identified a need for additional counselling services, childcare subsidies and assistance through respite care. All participants involved highlighted that caring for their grandchildren changed their lives in many positive ways. Conclusion While grandparents are frequently prioritized as caregivers of apprehended children, our study suggests that they are also disproportionately under-resourced and poorly supported relative to children that instead enter the foster care system. Based on these findings, we urge for the provision of critical resources to address the emotional, respite and financial needs of these vulnerable children and their grandparents.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».