78 CONCOMITANT MENINGITIS AMONG FEBRILE YOUNG INFANTS 29-60 DAYS OLD WITH A POSITIVE URINALYSIS AND THE NEED FOR LUMBAR PUNCTURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Fever among infants in the first months of life remains among the most common pediatric problems in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. These infants are at increased risk of potentially life-threatening serious bacterial infection (SBI), specifically urinary tract infections (UTIs), bacteremia and bacterial meningitis. Infants with UTIs have historically been considered at increased risk of bacterial meningitis. A presumptive diagnosis of UTI relies entirely upon abnormal urinalysis results in the ED, prompting further invasive testing by lumbar puncture, broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure and hospitalization. However, the necessity of lumbar puncture for infants older than 28 days on the basis of an abnormal urinalysis has been questioned for over a decade and remains controversial. Objectives The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of meningitis among well-appearing, febrile infants aged 29-60 days with a positive urinalysis, to inform whether routine CSF testing is required in these patients. Design/Methods We searched MEDLINE and Embase for articles published from January 1, 2000 to July 25, 2018, deliberately limiting the search to recent studies to account for: 1) changing SBI epidemiology; 2) evolving clinical definitions of UTI; and, 3) improvements in urinalysis diagnostic accuracy for febrile young infants. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported urinalysis results and SBI prevalence. In the case of studies reporting UTI prevalence but not UA results, or aggregate data only, the corresponding authors were contacted for details. The primary outcome was the prevalence of culture-proven bacterial meningitis among infants with a positive urinalysis. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of bacterial meningitis among infants with a positive urinalysis, defined by either a positive CSF culture or a suggestive history at 1-month post-discharge if CSF testing was not undertaken in the ED. Studies were assessed for bias using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool, and prevalence estimates for bacterial meningitis were pooled in a random effects meta-analysis. Results The parent search yielded 2334 unique citations, of which screening by title and abstract identified 106 for full text review. Eleven studies met inclusion and were ultimately included in the final meta-analysis. Seven studies did not have significant risk of bias for the primary outcome of interest. Among 1430 febrile infants with a positive urinalysis and CSF testing performed, 5 infants had culture-proven bacterial meningitis (primary outcome; prevalence 0.33%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 0.79%). Only these same 5 infants were considered to have bacterial meningitis among 2311 infants with a positive urinalysis and meningitis status ascertained by either CSF testing or clinical follow-up (secondary outcome; prevalence 0.24%, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.54%). Conclusion The prevalence of bacterial meningitis in well appearing febrile infants aged 29-60 days with a positive urinalysis is low. The practice of lumbar puncture in this subgroup of infants should not be guided by urinalysis results alone, but rather on the basis of other clinical criteria. Results should inform decisions regarding invasive testing and aid in shared decision-making.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,014 | 0,026 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».