MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3074621494 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxaa068.077

78 CONCOMITANT MENINGITIS AMONG FEBRILE YOUNG INFANTS 29-60 DAYS OLD WITH A POSITIVE URINALYSIS AND THE NEED FOR LUMBAR PUNCTURE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

2020· review· en· W3074621494 on OpenAlexaff
Fahad F. Mansouri, Vik Sabhaney, Garth Meckler, Quyhn Doan, Brett Burstein

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrinalysisMedicineLumbar punctureMeningitisPediatricsEpidemiologyBacteremiaUrinary systemIntensive care medicineInternal medicineAntibioticsCerebrospinal fluid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Fever among infants in the first months of life remains among the most common pediatric problems in the Emergency Department (ED) setting. These infants are at increased risk of potentially life-threatening serious bacterial infection (SBI), specifically urinary tract infections (UTIs), bacteremia and bacterial meningitis. Infants with UTIs have historically been considered at increased risk of bacterial meningitis. A presumptive diagnosis of UTI relies entirely upon abnormal urinalysis results in the ED, prompting further invasive testing by lumbar puncture, broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure and hospitalization. However, the necessity of lumbar puncture for infants older than 28 days on the basis of an abnormal urinalysis has been questioned for over a decade and remains controversial. Objectives The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of meningitis among well-appearing, febrile infants aged 29-60 days with a positive urinalysis, to inform whether routine CSF testing is required in these patients. Design/Methods We searched MEDLINE and Embase for articles published from January 1, 2000 to July 25, 2018, deliberately limiting the search to recent studies to account for: 1) changing SBI epidemiology; 2) evolving clinical definitions of UTI; and, 3) improvements in urinalysis diagnostic accuracy for febrile young infants. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported urinalysis results and SBI prevalence. In the case of studies reporting UTI prevalence but not UA results, or aggregate data only, the corresponding authors were contacted for details. The primary outcome was the prevalence of culture-proven bacterial meningitis among infants with a positive urinalysis. The secondary outcome was the prevalence of bacterial meningitis among infants with a positive urinalysis, defined by either a positive CSF culture or a suggestive history at 1-month post-discharge if CSF testing was not undertaken in the ED. Studies were assessed for bias using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool, and prevalence estimates for bacterial meningitis were pooled in a random effects meta-analysis. Results The parent search yielded 2334 unique citations, of which screening by title and abstract identified 106 for full text review. Eleven studies met inclusion and were ultimately included in the final meta-analysis. Seven studies did not have significant risk of bias for the primary outcome of interest. Among 1430 febrile infants with a positive urinalysis and CSF testing performed, 5 infants had culture-proven bacterial meningitis (primary outcome; prevalence 0.33%, 95% CI: 0.1% to 0.79%). Only these same 5 infants were considered to have bacterial meningitis among 2311 infants with a positive urinalysis and meningitis status ascertained by either CSF testing or clinical follow-up (secondary outcome; prevalence 0.24%, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.54%). Conclusion The prevalence of bacterial meningitis in well appearing febrile infants aged 29-60 days with a positive urinalysis is low. The practice of lumbar puncture in this subgroup of infants should not be guided by urinalysis results alone, but rather on the basis of other clinical criteria. Results should inform decisions regarding invasive testing and aid in shared decision-making.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.026
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicPediatric Urology and Nephrology StudiesFrench-language works237,207