The Impact of Leadership Style on Organizational Performance in Food Business Environments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The impact of leadership style on organizational performance has been studied extensively in general; however, the literature has a limited number of studies concerning the impact of leadership style on organizational performance concerning food business environments. On further narrowing the topic of concern, we see that the research conducted in relation to the impact of shared leadership style on organizational performance in food business environments is even more limited. It is also challenging to find a conclusive link between any specific leadership style in various sub-attributes of organizational performance, such as employee retention and food safety culture in the food business operations domain. This research explores the link between leadership style and performance to offer insight into the way in which leadership style creates the distinction between making the food organization more efficient and enhancing organizational performance in food organizations. This action research (AR) project was planned to resolve the organizational performance issues associated with ABC Foods, Canada using multi-qualitative methods. Key data were sourced through the learning set and internal interview at ABC Foods, complemented by external interviews of food industry leaders, and seasoned food professionals. The impact on organizational performance was studied through the analysis of two core elements: employee retention and food safety culture. The interview data were tabulated, trended, and processed through coding and constant comparison in order to establish the interrelationships. The information obtained through interviews was later brought back to the learning set at ABC Foods, where the need arose. Besides being a researcher, I was head of the team at ABC Foods in this project. The findings were challenged by the knowledge available from earlier researchers, wherever applicable. The results indicate that there is a positive relationship between shared leadership style and organization performance. The results also reveal a positive relationship between shared leadership, employee retention, shared leadership, and food safety culture.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».