ІСТОРІЯ УКРАЇНСЬКОГО СЕЛЯНСТВА 1917-1929 рр. У ТВОРАХ ЗАРУБІЖНИХ ДОСЛІДНИКІВ
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The question of research of history of the Ukrainian peasantry is considered 1917-1929 in labours of researchers from a diaspora and distant foreignness. Two important aspects are selected: insurgent motion and position of peasantry is in time of new economic policy. An important value for the study of insurgent motion is had division into periods of wars of bolshevists against the peasantry of A. Bezansona and A. Graciozi. Most full the estimation of new economic policy is presented in labours of the American economist V. Bandera. He considered that a new economic policy had been a transitional not policy, but expressly certain, functional system which gave a way the new economic mode. The question of studying the history of the Ukrainian peasantry 1917-1929, in the works of researchers from the Diaspora and far abroad. Singled out two important aspects: the insurgency and the condition of the peasantry during the new economic policy. Important for studying the insurgency has periodization of war of the Bolsheviks against the peasantry A. Besancon and A. Graziosi. A. Graziosi, in contrast to A. Besancon extends the territorial scope of confrontation between the Bolsheviks and the peasants, considering it «a large peasant war in the USSR». A. Adams was the situation in Ukraine in 1921-1923, as a spontaneous, anarchist and a bloody rebellion of the peasant masses, which allegedly do not have any political program and thought only about the satisfaction of their most immediate social interests. Labor, in which objectively investigated by anti-Bolshevik uprising, could be called the book of the Israeli historian M. Frenkin. Scientific works of Ukrainian historians of the Diaspora, where the insurgency in Ukraine there is not many. Article L. Poltava of the «Ukrainian insurgent units in 1919-1920 (new Soviet documents)» it’s not up to its name, as the information was taken by the author mainly from the Soviet historical literature, and not from the archival and published documents. Some historians of the Ukrainian Diaspora only superficially dealt with the problem of the insurgency, considering it in the context of various historical issues. This trend is observed in the Canadian historians E. Pasternak and М. Pаlij. The authors consider the situation of Ukraine under the rule of the Bolsheviks in 1919-1939, and the history of the Second Winter journey. The new economic policy was also reflected in the works of the researchers of the far abroad. The problem of the NEP was studied V. Oikan. This work gave an opportunity not only to make a conclusion about the imperfection of the new economic policy of the Bolsheviks, but also to reach the level of generalization of the world scale. R. Daniels assessed the NEP as a return to the stage of bourgeois-democratic revolution, and in General - a deviation from Marxist ideals and «rebirth of Leninism». T. Anderson considered NEP «new capitalist politics in socialist theory». Supported this point of view, and E. Lyons, who called NEP «compromise with capitalism» under the name of «state capitalism». A. Meyer in the book «Soviet political system» characterize the NEP as a system, in which the «peacefully co-existed capitalism and socialism. The most complete assessment of the new economic policy is presented in the works of the economist V. Bandera. He believed that the NEP was not transition policies, and clear, functional system, which gave way to a new economic regime. Thus, historians from the Diaspora and foreign scientists by their works serves new materials for reflection, make non-standard conclusions of many problems of the history of the Ukrainian peasantry period of the national-democratic revolution and the new economic policy. However, most of these works created on the basis of a small number of sources, and therefore the facts stated in them, need to be carefully checked
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,010 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle