Manoly R. Lupul. the Politics of Multiculturalism: A Ukrainian-Canadian Memoir
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Manoly R. Lupul. The Politics of Multiculturalism: A Ukrainian-Canadian Memoir. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 2005. xviii, 508 pp. Illustrations. Index. $34.95 hc. Manoly Lupul's book shows what many have known--that history would not exist if it were not written down, and also that the detail of history is often written in memoirs. Lupul's memoir tells us much about the policy of multiculturalism in Canada, particularly its early years, as Lupul was intimately connected with the pop icy's implementation through his work on the Canadian Consultative Council on Multiculturalism. He deals with the shifts in multicultural policy under the different political parties in power, with the efforts to entrench multiculturalism in the repatriated Canadian constitution in the early eighties, with multiculturalism, on the provincial and urban levels, with the political backlash against multiculturalism, and multiculturalism's decline, beginning in the late eighties and into the nineties. The discussion is, of course, in terms of Lupul's personal experience, but it contains much detail, the kind that one would not find anywhere else in the literature on the history of multiculturalism. As Roman Petryshyn, himself a veteran multiculturalist, points out in his succinct foreword to the book, for Lupul, the key to ethnocultural justice was a school curriculum that gave students a linguistic choice. The student could choose to learn as the second language the language of his or her ancestors. At the same time, the curriculum would portray Canada's cultural diversity. Lupul points out that in spite of the manifest statements on Canada as a multicultural society, the federal government considered multiculturalism to be second in importance to bilingualism and often showed resistance to a substantive multicultural program. The suggestions made by the Canadian Consultative Council on Multiculturalism, the federal government's own creation that Lupul chaired for a time, were often not followed. The attempts to bring together the federal and provincial multicultural bodies for any joint action were continuously resisted. Lupul points out how little power government advisory bodies have. He also shows how difficult it is to bring together different ethnic groups for common political action and what kind of ethnic leaders are most successful in gaining public assistance for their group's objectives. One of Lupul's most significant accomplishments was the establishment in 1976 of the Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies at the University of Alberta. The memoir provides much of the nitty-gritty detail of the process of founding the Institute, the persons involved in its creation, the arguments that were presented for, as well as against, its establishment and its final success, not just as a regional, but also as a Ukrainian Canadian national institution. Likewise, Lupul describes the role he, as well as the main protagonists, played in the establishment of the Chair of Ukrainian Studies at the University of Toronto. He gives the history of the early stages of producing the English language Encyclopedia of Ukraine. He also says much about the introduction of bilingual programs in schools in Alberta and Manitoba, about the Ukrainian Canadian Committee (now Congress), and many other community efforts. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».