LABORATORY SCALE EVALUATION OF THE FEASIBILITY OF USING GUANIDINIUM SALTS AS A MEANS OF INSITU SOIL STRENGTHENING FOR WEAK CLAYS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Deep-seated, slow moving landslides are widespread throughout the prairie provinces of Canada, especially in Saskatchewan and eastern Alberta. These landslides are characterized by a thick deposit of glacial drift underlain by poorly lithified cretaceous shale (Bearpaw, Lea Park formations). Multiple thin layers of extremely weak, smectite rich, clayey soils are often found within the upper portions of these cretaceous shale formations. The interfaces of these smectitic clay lenses typically produce a pronounced shear plane, turning the overlying soils into a large slump block. Landslides of this nature can span several hundred meters in length, which provides a threat to infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and pipelines.\n\nDue to the depth of these shear zones, and the scale of these types of creeping failures, remediation via traditional geotechnical engineering solutions is either not feasible or extremely costly to pursue. The lack of available solutions for this common problem has prompted research that stems from a multi-disciplinary approach. The current research is intended to evaluate the feasibility of modifying the porewater chemistry of these smectitic shear zones by using guanidinium chloride to propagate mineralogical alteration through ion exchange, as a means of insitu soil strengthening.\n\nThis study was limited to laboratory scale testing. The specific objectives for this research were to: i.) characterise the mechanism by which guanidinium salts can alter the mineralogical and macroscopically observable properties of natural expansive clay soils; and, ii.) assess fundamental questions pertaining to the full-scale implementation of the proposed insitu strengthening technique.\n\nA local prairie soil, Regina Clay, was used for the majority of testing procedures, as it is readily available and is representative of the types of soils associated with the problem that this research aimed to address. The results from a series of batch-style geotechnical and mineralogical testing procedures contributed to a clearer understanding of the mechanisms associated with this treatment, the required strengths of saline solution for treatment, quantified the effects of treatment, and the permanence of the effects associated with this treatment.\n\nTreating expansive soils with concentrations of 0.1 molar guanidinium chloride saline solutions were found to cause permanent alterations to the smectite mineral’s basal spacing and soil fabric, increase the permeability by half an order of magnitude, and increase the residual shear strength by up to 100%, all without reducing the oedometric stiffness.\nAs the present study is limited to laboratory-scale trials, a full-scale test site is recommended to further validate the effects found in this research. However, despite the limitations of this work, the potential for insitu soil strengthening via guanidinium salts appears to be significant.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».