LABORATORY SCALE EVALUATION OF THE FEASIBILITY OF USING GUANIDINIUM SALTS AS A MEANS OF INSITU SOIL STRENGTHENING FOR WEAK CLAYS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep-seated, slow moving landslides are widespread throughout the prairie provinces of Canada, especially in Saskatchewan and eastern Alberta. These landslides are characterized by a thick deposit of glacial drift underlain by poorly lithified cretaceous shale (Bearpaw, Lea Park formations). Multiple thin layers of extremely weak, smectite rich, clayey soils are often found within the upper portions of these cretaceous shale formations. The interfaces of these smectitic clay lenses typically produce a pronounced shear plane, turning the overlying soils into a large slump block. Landslides of this nature can span several hundred meters in length, which provides a threat to infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and pipelines.\n\nDue to the depth of these shear zones, and the scale of these types of creeping failures, remediation via traditional geotechnical engineering solutions is either not feasible or extremely costly to pursue. The lack of available solutions for this common problem has prompted research that stems from a multi-disciplinary approach. The current research is intended to evaluate the feasibility of modifying the porewater chemistry of these smectitic shear zones by using guanidinium chloride to propagate mineralogical alteration through ion exchange, as a means of insitu soil strengthening.\n\nThis study was limited to laboratory scale testing. The specific objectives for this research were to: i.) characterise the mechanism by which guanidinium salts can alter the mineralogical and macroscopically observable properties of natural expansive clay soils; and, ii.) assess fundamental questions pertaining to the full-scale implementation of the proposed insitu strengthening technique.\n\nA local prairie soil, Regina Clay, was used for the majority of testing procedures, as it is readily available and is representative of the types of soils associated with the problem that this research aimed to address. The results from a series of batch-style geotechnical and mineralogical testing procedures contributed to a clearer understanding of the mechanisms associated with this treatment, the required strengths of saline solution for treatment, quantified the effects of treatment, and the permanence of the effects associated with this treatment.\n\nTreating expansive soils with concentrations of 0.1 molar guanidinium chloride saline solutions were found to cause permanent alterations to the smectite mineral’s basal spacing and soil fabric, increase the permeability by half an order of magnitude, and increase the residual shear strength by up to 100%, all without reducing the oedometric stiffness.\nAs the present study is limited to laboratory-scale trials, a full-scale test site is recommended to further validate the effects found in this research. However, despite the limitations of this work, the potential for insitu soil strengthening via guanidinium salts appears to be significant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".