A Reflective Look at Thirty Years of Music Therapy Training at Capilano College/Un Regard Réfléchi Sur 30 Années De Formation En Musicothérapie À Capilano College
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In September of 1976, the first Canadian Music Therapy training program began at Capilano College, in North Vancouver, British Columbia.[NM:] Music therapy didn't exist in B.C. before 1970. Due to the serendipity of two completely independent hitch-hiking encounters, both Carolyn and I joined forces with the innovators of an improvisational approach to community building for children with special needs, called the Children's Spontaneous Music[CK/NM:] Those early days were very exciting. In response to the work of the Children's Spontaneous Music Workshops (see Kenny, 2006), and a series of workshops we conducted in the Greater Vancouver area in the mid '70s (see Kenny, 1976), there was a groundswell of requests from the professional community, to train There was considerable interest from Eastern Canada as well. McGill University sent Deans, Faculty, and Program Directors to meet with us in Vancouver, with the idea of beginning a Music Therapy Program back east.Meanwhile, we were attempting to gain interest at the University of British Columbia (UBC). There were some faculty members who were extremely interested in getting a Music Therapy program going at UBC especially with our presence at the Bob Berwick Memorial Centre for Children and Carolyn's presence in the Department of Psychiatry at the UBC Psych Hospital. Word of Nancy's work at the Vancouver Neurological Centre had also come to the attention of some of the faculty at UBC. At the time, we were teaching some courses on Music Therapy and Creative Arts Therapies at UBC to health care and early education professionals, through Continuing Education. In the end, however, they decided not to go for it.Then all of a sudden, one day we got a call from Karl Koylanski, the head of Music at Capilano, who had heard about our work through the Music faculty at UBC. Capilano College invited us to come up to the College to talk with them about a possible program. They were getting requests from the community for music therapists. Five months later, the first class began (McMaster, 1983). And the rest is history.[CK:] In the beginning, there were two major influences. The first was the spontaneous improvisation, which was the core of the work in the Children's Spontaneous Music Workshops Nancy and I had participated in. We continued to work this way through the mid-1970s. For more information see the film Listen to the Music-Makers by Kenny & McMaster (1976) and the article by McMaster (1976). The other major influence was Nancy's training and education in England with Clive Robbins and Paul Nordoff.[NM:] The Nordoff-Robbins training was a profoundly life-changing experience that deepened my appreciation for and for an essentially spiritual perspective about clients, and Music Therapy. I had just completed an intensive course of classical piano studies at the Guildhall in London, after six months in India, and I was wide open. I would say that the combination of those influences and of Carolyn's First Nations heritage laid an implicit spiritual foundation for the Capilano program.[CK:] I had done my training in the United States. But I can't really say that was an influence because we rejected most of the elements of the U.S. education and training in therapy in the original design of the program. The one element from my U.S. therapy training that we did include in the program was the use of Psychodrama for practicum supervision. This was a very effective part of the original curriculum.[CK/NM:] The program was designed as a two-year graduate training program very much like the programs in Europe. Our idea was to attract applicants who already had a Bachelor's degree in or a health-related profession so that we could focus on the development of their therapy knowledge and skills.The central values of the Music Therapy program at Capilano included creativity and aesthetics, human development through the arts, a humanist/holistic perspective on human nature and development, and commitment to self-awareness and group dynamics throughout the training. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,018 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».