MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3091976069 · doi:10.1353/aq.2020.0040

Intimacies of the Atom: On Rocks and Decolonization in the Work of Leslie Marmon Silko

2020· article· en· W3091976069 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isabel Lockhart

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican Quarterly · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAtomic energyUraniumNuclear weaponManhattan projectCommissionWork (physics)Enriched uraniumPolitical scienceLawSociologyPhysicsNuclear physicsAgency (philosophy)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Intimacies of the Atom:On Rocks and Decolonization in the Work of Leslie Marmon Silko Isabel Lockhart (bio) In an effort to promote domestic uranium extraction in the late 1940s, the United States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) made public its "orebuying schedule" and successfully incentivized aggressive prospecting in the sandstone-rich lands of the Southwest.1 In 1951 the Anaconda Mining Company identified a huge uranium deposit underneath the Laguna Pueblo village of Paguate in New Mexico.2 By 1958 Anaconda's Jackpile mine had grown to become the largest open-pit uranium mine in the United States, supplying much of the raw material for a period of great nuclear exuberance. On the one hand, the AEC was rushing to build up a national armory in the early years of the Cold War; on the other, following President Dwight D. Eisenhower's 1953 "Atoms for Peace" speech, the commission sought to quell anxieties around the bomb with an optimistic vision for the civilian uses of nuclear science. At a radiotoxic site of extraction like Jackpile, however, this implied distinction between weaponry and energy appears especially subtle or even nonpertinent. Indeed, sites of extraction are situated many translations in the nuclear supply chain away from uranium enrichment, which itself reveals that the distinction between energy and weaponry is one primarily of degree. Exploiting an uncontrolled rendition of the nuclear fission that produces nuclear power in a reactor, the atomic bomb is an energy technology, and, in both its military and its nonmilitary guises, nuclearity is fundamentally about the extraction and intensification of energy from ore rock.3 To study the extractive disposition toward subsurface minerals as latent energy, we might attend to literatures that mediate nuclear processes and legacies. One such archive emerges from Indigenous perspectives on the atomic age. Across the settler colonies of the United States, Canada, and Australia, Indigenous peoples have been disproportionately impacted by the nuclear industry at all stages of production—as forcibly removed communities, as downwinders and downstreamers to "tests" and tailings waste, and as cheapened labor in [End Page 675] mines and mills. During the peak years of extraction, Jackpile mine was one among thousands of uranium mines in the Colorado Plateau, and in the US Southwest alone the industry has variously affected the Navajo, the Zuni, the Mescalero Apache, the Western Shoshone, the Southern Paiute, and numerous of the Pueblo nations. This, in the Southwest and elsewhere, has led to a large body of work by Indigenous authors, much of which pays particular attention to the ore-bearing rock, its severance from a local ecology, and the deathly ways it has been energized by the settler colony. For example, in her 2002 play Burning Vision, the Métis playwright Marie Clements confronts the history of uranium extraction on Dene land at Great Bear Lake in the Northwest Territories of Canada. Over the course of the play, Clements personifies pitchblende as a "beautiful Native boy" named Little Boy (after the bomb), charting his transit from Great Bear Lake to the Manhattan Project's Trinity Site for military testing.4 Similarly, in A Blanket of Butterflies, the Dogrib graphic novelist Richard Van Camp grapples with the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki via the memories of a Dene grandmother, as she recalls Dene and white laborers "taking black eggs out of the earth and putting them into the bellies of these birds" that "dropped two eggs on people who look just like us."5 Against the immateriality of nuclear exposure, these two texts make recourse to ore rock as a way to map and make visible a triangular relation between the point of extraction (Great Bear Lake), production (the US Southwest), and detonation (Hiroshima and Nagasaki).6 Although radioactivity resonates with what Elizabeth DeLoughrey, following Gayatri Spivak, names "planetarity"—an uncanny phenomenon that is entirely resistant to capture or visualization—it does not preclude a practice of reckoning with what is visible and material.7 This is not radiation itself but its most charged objects. The material current running through this Indigenous archive on the atomic age serves as a reminder that energy resources in the Americas are colonized earth matter: energy resources have been removed...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,318
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,859

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,185
Écart entre enseignants0,178 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican QuarterlyMême sujetAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryTravaux en français237 207