MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3091976069 · doi:10.1353/aq.2020.0040

Intimacies of the Atom: On Rocks and Decolonization in the Work of Leslie Marmon Silko

2020· article· en· W3091976069 on OpenAlex
Isabel Lockhart

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Quarterly · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtomic energyUraniumNuclear weaponManhattan projectCommissionWork (physics)Enriched uraniumPolitical scienceLawSociologyPhysicsNuclear physicsAgency (philosophy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intimacies of the Atom:On Rocks and Decolonization in the Work of Leslie Marmon Silko Isabel Lockhart (bio) In an effort to promote domestic uranium extraction in the late 1940s, the United States Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) made public its "orebuying schedule" and successfully incentivized aggressive prospecting in the sandstone-rich lands of the Southwest.1 In 1951 the Anaconda Mining Company identified a huge uranium deposit underneath the Laguna Pueblo village of Paguate in New Mexico.2 By 1958 Anaconda's Jackpile mine had grown to become the largest open-pit uranium mine in the United States, supplying much of the raw material for a period of great nuclear exuberance. On the one hand, the AEC was rushing to build up a national armory in the early years of the Cold War; on the other, following President Dwight D. Eisenhower's 1953 "Atoms for Peace" speech, the commission sought to quell anxieties around the bomb with an optimistic vision for the civilian uses of nuclear science. At a radiotoxic site of extraction like Jackpile, however, this implied distinction between weaponry and energy appears especially subtle or even nonpertinent. Indeed, sites of extraction are situated many translations in the nuclear supply chain away from uranium enrichment, which itself reveals that the distinction between energy and weaponry is one primarily of degree. Exploiting an uncontrolled rendition of the nuclear fission that produces nuclear power in a reactor, the atomic bomb is an energy technology, and, in both its military and its nonmilitary guises, nuclearity is fundamentally about the extraction and intensification of energy from ore rock.3 To study the extractive disposition toward subsurface minerals as latent energy, we might attend to literatures that mediate nuclear processes and legacies. One such archive emerges from Indigenous perspectives on the atomic age. Across the settler colonies of the United States, Canada, and Australia, Indigenous peoples have been disproportionately impacted by the nuclear industry at all stages of production—as forcibly removed communities, as downwinders and downstreamers to "tests" and tailings waste, and as cheapened labor in [End Page 675] mines and mills. During the peak years of extraction, Jackpile mine was one among thousands of uranium mines in the Colorado Plateau, and in the US Southwest alone the industry has variously affected the Navajo, the Zuni, the Mescalero Apache, the Western Shoshone, the Southern Paiute, and numerous of the Pueblo nations. This, in the Southwest and elsewhere, has led to a large body of work by Indigenous authors, much of which pays particular attention to the ore-bearing rock, its severance from a local ecology, and the deathly ways it has been energized by the settler colony. For example, in her 2002 play Burning Vision, the Métis playwright Marie Clements confronts the history of uranium extraction on Dene land at Great Bear Lake in the Northwest Territories of Canada. Over the course of the play, Clements personifies pitchblende as a "beautiful Native boy" named Little Boy (after the bomb), charting his transit from Great Bear Lake to the Manhattan Project's Trinity Site for military testing.4 Similarly, in A Blanket of Butterflies, the Dogrib graphic novelist Richard Van Camp grapples with the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki via the memories of a Dene grandmother, as she recalls Dene and white laborers "taking black eggs out of the earth and putting them into the bellies of these birds" that "dropped two eggs on people who look just like us."5 Against the immateriality of nuclear exposure, these two texts make recourse to ore rock as a way to map and make visible a triangular relation between the point of extraction (Great Bear Lake), production (the US Southwest), and detonation (Hiroshima and Nagasaki).6 Although radioactivity resonates with what Elizabeth DeLoughrey, following Gayatri Spivak, names "planetarity"—an uncanny phenomenon that is entirely resistant to capture or visualization—it does not preclude a practice of reckoning with what is visible and material.7 This is not radiation itself but its most charged objects. The material current running through this Indigenous archive on the atomic age serves as a reminder that energy resources in the Americas are colonized earth matter: energy resources have been removed...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.318
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it