Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analyses of High-Risk Subgroups in the KarMMa Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Outcomes remain poor in patients with high-risk relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving conventional treatments, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD agents), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 antibodies. The pivotal phase 2 KarMMa study (NCT03361748) demonstrated deep and durable responses with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), a BCMA-directed CAR T cell therapy, in triple-class exposed patients with RRMM. The overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, median duration of response (DOR), and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 73%, 33%, 10.7 months, and 8.8 months, respectively, across the target dose levels of 150−450 × 106 CAR+ T cells, and 82%, 39%, 11.3 months, and 12.1 months at the highest target dose of 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells (Munshi et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38[suppl, abstr]:8503). The most frequent all-grade adverse events were cytopenias (97%) and cytokine release syndrome (84%). Here we report safety and efficacy from the KarMMa study in patient subgroups that are historically difficult to treat. Methods: Patients in KarMMa had received ≥3 prior regimens, including an IMiD agent, a PI, and an anti-CD38 antibody, and were refractory to their last regimen per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. After lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2/day) and fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) for 3 days followed by 2 days of rest, patients received target doses of 150, 300, or 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells. We performed subgroup analyses in patients stratified by high-risk characteristics, including those with extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics [del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16)], high tumor burden (defined as ≥50% bone marrow plasma cells), receipt of bridging therapy, disease stage III at baseline (per the revised International Staging System [R-ISS]), and >1 prior regimen per year. The primary endpoint was ORR. Additional endpoints included CR rate (key secondary), DOR, PFS, and safety. ORR and CR were assessed per IMWG criteria; DOR and PFS were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Among all 128 ide-cel treated patients, 39% had extramedullary disease, 35% had high-risk cytogenetics, 51% had high tumor burden, 88% received bridging therapy, 16% had R-ISS disease stage III, and 47% had received >1 prior antimyeloma regimen per year. The ORR and CR rate were ≥65% and ≥20%, respectively, across all high-risk subgroups examined except patients with R-ISS disease stage III (Table). Notably, the presence of extramedullary disease and baseline tumor burden did not substantially affect ORR (70% with and 76% without extramedullary disease; 71% with and 77% without high tumor burden). CR rates were 24% in patients with and 39% in patients without extramedullary disease, and 29% in patients with and 37% in patients without high tumor burden. The median DOR was ≥9.1 months and the median PFS was ≥7.5 months in all subgroups examined except in patients with R-ISS stage III (Table). In the subgroups (baseline tumor burden and bridging therapy) analyzed for safety, no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the benefit of ide-cel in historically difficult-to-treat patient subsets. Deep and durable responses were observed in most subgroups, even in those with the highest risk, including patients with more aggressive disease features (extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics, and high tumor burden), and those who received bridging therapy or multiple prior regiments per year. These results further support the favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel and suggest that ide-cel represents a promising treatment option for patients with RRMM, including those with high-risk disease. Table Disclosures Raje: Bluebird, Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Caribou: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immuneel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Siegel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celulatiry: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Legend Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lonial:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JUNO Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Munshi:Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company; Adaptive: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD): Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma GmbH: Research Funding. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel accomodations, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel accomodations, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Truppel-Hartmann:bluebird bio, Inc: Current Employment, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); F. Hoffmann La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Rowe:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Huang:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Agarwal:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Campbell:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. San-Miguel:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Sanofi: Consultancy, Memb
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».