MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3094639681 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-134319

Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analyses of High-Risk Subgroups in the KarMMa Study

2020· article· en· W3094639681 sur OpenAlexaff
Noopur Raje, David S. Siegel, Sundar Jagannath, Sagar Lonial, Nikhil C. Munshi, Philippe Moreau, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Michèle Cavo, Anna Truppel-Hartmann, Everton Rowe, Liping Huang, Amit Agarwal, Julie Wang, Timothy Campbell, Jesús F. San Miguel, Donna Reece

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMultiple myelomaMedicineInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)PomalidomideLenalidomideOncologyHematologic NeoplasmsTransplantationBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Outcomes remain poor in patients with high-risk relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving conventional treatments, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD agents), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 antibodies. The pivotal phase 2 KarMMa study (NCT03361748) demonstrated deep and durable responses with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), a BCMA-directed CAR T cell therapy, in triple-class exposed patients with RRMM. The overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, median duration of response (DOR), and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 73%, 33%, 10.7 months, and 8.8 months, respectively, across the target dose levels of 150−450 × 106 CAR+ T cells, and 82%, 39%, 11.3 months, and 12.1 months at the highest target dose of 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells (Munshi et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38[suppl, abstr]:8503). The most frequent all-grade adverse events were cytopenias (97%) and cytokine release syndrome (84%). Here we report safety and efficacy from the KarMMa study in patient subgroups that are historically difficult to treat. Methods: Patients in KarMMa had received ≥3 prior regimens, including an IMiD agent, a PI, and an anti-CD38 antibody, and were refractory to their last regimen per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. After lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2/day) and fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) for 3 days followed by 2 days of rest, patients received target doses of 150, 300, or 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells. We performed subgroup analyses in patients stratified by high-risk characteristics, including those with extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics [del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16)], high tumor burden (defined as ≥50% bone marrow plasma cells), receipt of bridging therapy, disease stage III at baseline (per the revised International Staging System [R-ISS]), and >1 prior regimen per year. The primary endpoint was ORR. Additional endpoints included CR rate (key secondary), DOR, PFS, and safety. ORR and CR were assessed per IMWG criteria; DOR and PFS were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Among all 128 ide-cel treated patients, 39% had extramedullary disease, 35% had high-risk cytogenetics, 51% had high tumor burden, 88% received bridging therapy, 16% had R-ISS disease stage III, and 47% had received >1 prior antimyeloma regimen per year. The ORR and CR rate were ≥65% and ≥20%, respectively, across all high-risk subgroups examined except patients with R-ISS disease stage III (Table). Notably, the presence of extramedullary disease and baseline tumor burden did not substantially affect ORR (70% with and 76% without extramedullary disease; 71% with and 77% without high tumor burden). CR rates were 24% in patients with and 39% in patients without extramedullary disease, and 29% in patients with and 37% in patients without high tumor burden. The median DOR was ≥9.1 months and the median PFS was ≥7.5 months in all subgroups examined except in patients with R-ISS stage III (Table). In the subgroups (baseline tumor burden and bridging therapy) analyzed for safety, no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the benefit of ide-cel in historically difficult-to-treat patient subsets. Deep and durable responses were observed in most subgroups, even in those with the highest risk, including patients with more aggressive disease features (extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics, and high tumor burden), and those who received bridging therapy or multiple prior regiments per year. These results further support the favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel and suggest that ide-cel represents a promising treatment option for patients with RRMM, including those with high-risk disease. Table Disclosures Raje: Bluebird, Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Caribou: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immuneel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Siegel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celulatiry: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Legend Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lonial:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JUNO Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Munshi:Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company; Adaptive: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD): Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma GmbH: Research Funding. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel accomodations, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel accomodations, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Truppel-Hartmann:bluebird bio, Inc: Current Employment, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); F. Hoffmann La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Rowe:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Huang:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Agarwal:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Campbell:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. San-Miguel:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Sanofi: Consultancy, Memb

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,299
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,571

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,330
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations32
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207