MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094639681 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-134319

Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Analyses of High-Risk Subgroups in the KarMMa Study

2020· article· en· W3094639681 on OpenAlexaff
Noopur Raje, David S. Siegel, Sundar Jagannath, Sagar Lonial, Nikhil C. Munshi, Philippe Moreau, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Michèle Cavo, Anna Truppel-Hartmann, Everton Rowe, Liping Huang, Amit Agarwal, Julie Wang, Timothy Campbell, Jesús F. San Miguel, Donna Reece

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple myelomaMedicineInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)PomalidomideLenalidomideOncologyHematologic NeoplasmsTransplantationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Outcomes remain poor in patients with high-risk relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving conventional treatments, including immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD agents), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 antibodies. The pivotal phase 2 KarMMa study (NCT03361748) demonstrated deep and durable responses with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), a BCMA-directed CAR T cell therapy, in triple-class exposed patients with RRMM. The overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, median duration of response (DOR), and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 73%, 33%, 10.7 months, and 8.8 months, respectively, across the target dose levels of 150−450 × 106 CAR+ T cells, and 82%, 39%, 11.3 months, and 12.1 months at the highest target dose of 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells (Munshi et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38[suppl, abstr]:8503). The most frequent all-grade adverse events were cytopenias (97%) and cytokine release syndrome (84%). Here we report safety and efficacy from the KarMMa study in patient subgroups that are historically difficult to treat. Methods: Patients in KarMMa had received ≥3 prior regimens, including an IMiD agent, a PI, and an anti-CD38 antibody, and were refractory to their last regimen per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. After lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2/day) and fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day) for 3 days followed by 2 days of rest, patients received target doses of 150, 300, or 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells. We performed subgroup analyses in patients stratified by high-risk characteristics, including those with extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics [del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16)], high tumor burden (defined as ≥50% bone marrow plasma cells), receipt of bridging therapy, disease stage III at baseline (per the revised International Staging System [R-ISS]), and >1 prior regimen per year. The primary endpoint was ORR. Additional endpoints included CR rate (key secondary), DOR, PFS, and safety. ORR and CR were assessed per IMWG criteria; DOR and PFS were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Among all 128 ide-cel treated patients, 39% had extramedullary disease, 35% had high-risk cytogenetics, 51% had high tumor burden, 88% received bridging therapy, 16% had R-ISS disease stage III, and 47% had received >1 prior antimyeloma regimen per year. The ORR and CR rate were ≥65% and ≥20%, respectively, across all high-risk subgroups examined except patients with R-ISS disease stage III (Table). Notably, the presence of extramedullary disease and baseline tumor burden did not substantially affect ORR (70% with and 76% without extramedullary disease; 71% with and 77% without high tumor burden). CR rates were 24% in patients with and 39% in patients without extramedullary disease, and 29% in patients with and 37% in patients without high tumor burden. The median DOR was ≥9.1 months and the median PFS was ≥7.5 months in all subgroups examined except in patients with R-ISS stage III (Table). In the subgroups (baseline tumor burden and bridging therapy) analyzed for safety, no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: These results demonstrate the benefit of ide-cel in historically difficult-to-treat patient subsets. Deep and durable responses were observed in most subgroups, even in those with the highest risk, including patients with more aggressive disease features (extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics, and high tumor burden), and those who received bridging therapy or multiple prior regiments per year. These results further support the favorable benefit-risk profile of ide-cel and suggest that ide-cel represents a promising treatment option for patients with RRMM, including those with high-risk disease. Table Disclosures Raje: Bluebird, Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astrazeneca: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Caribou: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immuneel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Siegel:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celulatiry: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jagannath:Legend Biotech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria. Lonial:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; JUNO Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy. Munshi:Amgen: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; C4: Current equity holder in private company; Adaptive: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; OncoPep: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Moreau:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Incyte: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Foundation: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product:, Research Funding; University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany: Current Employment; GlaxoSmithKline (GSK): Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product, Research Funding; Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD): Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johns Hopkins University: Other: Grants and/or provision of Investigational Medicinal Product; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma GmbH: Research Funding. Cavo:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel accomodations, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel accomodations, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Truppel-Hartmann:bluebird bio, Inc: Current Employment, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); F. Hoffmann La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Rowe:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Huang:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Agarwal:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Campbell:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. San-Miguel:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Sanofi: Consultancy, Memb

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207