MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3095151225 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-140408

Adore: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 1/2 Open-Platform Study Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Novel Ruxolitinib Combinations in Patients with Myelofibrosis

2020· article· en· W3095151225 sur OpenAlexaff
Andrew C. Perkins, Kate Burbury, Thomas Lehmann, David M. Ross, Andreas Reiter, Vikas Gupta, Claire Harrison, Jean‐Jacques Kiladjian, Alessandro M. Vannucchi, Mariëlle J. Wondergem, Robert P. Pack, Monika Wroclawska, Celine Wilke, Angela Zhang, Florian H. Heidel

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRuxolitinibMyelofibrosisOpen labelMedicinePhases of clinical researchRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineClinical trialOncologySurgeryBone marrow

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by megakaryocyte proliferation and progressive bone marrow fibrosis. Additional clinical features include splenomegaly due to extramedullary hematopoiesis, cytopenias resulting from bone marrow failure, and constitutional symptoms. MF can develop de novo (primary MF) or from the progression of antecedent MPNs, in particular polycythemia vera (PPV-MF) or essential thrombocythemia (PET-MF). At diagnosis, nearly one-quarter of patients (pts) are red blood cell transfusion dependent, and nearly 40% exhibit hemoglobin levels < 10 g/dL. Additionally, pts with MF have a shortened survival and reduced quality of life (QOL). Ruxolitinib (RUX), a first-in-class JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, is the standard of care for MF and was approved on the basis of the COMFORT studies. In these studies, RUX demonstrated superiority over placebo (COMFORT-I) and best available therapy (COMFORT-II) in improving splenomegaly, MF-related symptoms, and QOL. An overall survival benefit was also observed with RUX (Harrison CN, et al. Leukemia. 2016). However, RUX is not a curative therapy and cytopenias remain a challenge in the management of MF. Additionally, not all pts respond to RUX, with some losing response while on treatment and some discontinuing treatment due to adverse events. RUX in combination with novel agents may offer superior disease control and transformative clinical benefits, including prolonged progression-free survival and improved cytopenias and QOL, and may reduce the malignant clone and bone marrow fibrosis. METHODS ADORE (NCT04097821) is a 3-part, open-label, multicenter, Phase 1/2 open-platform study that will assess the safety and efficacy of RUX in combination with ≥ 3 novel compounds (siremadlin [HDM2 inhibitor], crizanlizumab [P-selectin inhibitor], or sabatolimab [TIM-3 inhibitor]) for the treatment of MF (Figure). The study will include pts ≥ 18 years old who have primary MF, PPV-MF, or PET-MF, splenomegaly (a palpable spleen ≥ 5 cm from the left costal margin or spleen volume ≥ 450 cm3 by MRI or CT scan), hemoglobin level < 10 g/dL, and platelet count ≥ 75 × 109/L (≥ 50 × 109/L in Parts 2 and 3). Pts must have been treated with RUX for ≥ 24 weeks and have received a stable dose for ≥ 8 weeks prior to study entry. Key exclusion criteria include splenic irradiation within 6 months or blood platelet transfusion within 28 days of study start. Part 1 (Phase 1b) includes a Dose-escalation arm to determine the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the combination of siremadlin and RUX, and 2 safety run-in arms to confirm the doses of crizanlizumab plus RUX and sabatolimab plus RUX combinations. RUX will be administered at the same stable dose used prior to study entry. A Bayesian logistic regression model will be used to identify the maximum tolerated dose and/or RP2D for the siremadlin and RUX combination. Pts will be treated for a planned duration of ≥ 6 cycles (24 weeks). The primary endpoint for Part 1 is the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities within the first 2 cycles. The combination treatments evaluated as safe and tolerable in Part 1 will proceed to Part 2. In Part 2 (Phase 2; early efficacy assessment, Selection), pts will be randomized with equal probability to 1 of the selected combination treatments or RUX monotherapy and treated for ≥ 12 cycles (48 weeks). After all Part 2 pts have completed 24 weeks of treatment, an interim analysis will be conducted to determine which treatment should be dropped for futility or considered in Part 3 (Phase 2; efficacy, Expansion). In Part 3, pts will be randomized 2:1:1 to the combination treatment arm, RUX cessation arm (novel agent monotherapy), or RUX monotherapy arm and treated for ≥ 12 cycles. Pts in the RUX cessation arm will be treated with RUX combination therapy for 12 weeks, followed by tapering of RUX. The primary endpoint for Parts 2 and 3 is the response rate for the composite endpoint of anemia improvement (increase in hemoglobin of ≥ 1.5 g/dL), no spleen volume progression, and no symptom worsening at the end of 6 treatment cycles (24 weeks). Secondary efficacy endpoints include hemoglobin improvement, change in spleen size, progression-free survival, change in symptoms, and bone marrow fibrosis improvement. The study will end 24 months after the last pt has initiated Part 3. Planned enrollment for the study with the current 3 combinations is 130 pts. Enrollment is currently ongoing. Disclosures Perkins: Novartis Oncology: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lehmann:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Reiter:Incyte: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; AOP: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Celgene,: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Deciphera: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Blueprint: Consultancy, Other: travel support ; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel support , Research Funding; Gilead: Other: travel support . Gupta:Sierra Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol MyersSquibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Harrison:Roche: Honoraria; Sierra Oncology: Honoraria; Promedior: Honoraria; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; CTI Biopharma Corp: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Gilead Sciences: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Incyte Corporation: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Kiladjian:AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Vannucchi:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Blueprint: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Wondergem:Celgene: Other: Educational talks; Novartis: Other: Educational talks. Pack:Novartis Pharma AG: Current Employment. Wroclawska:Novartis Pharma AG: Current Employment. Wilke:Novartis Pharma AG: Current Employment, Other: Stock owner. Zhang:Novartis Pharma AG: Current Employment. Heidel:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,034

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,077
Tête enseignante GPT0,368
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207