Safety and Efficacy of Ex Vivo Expanded Healthy Donor-Derived Double Negative T Cells for the Treatment of AML Relapsed after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: A First in-Human Phase I/IIa Clinical Trial
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND Relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the main cause of treatment failure for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Conventional treatments such as donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) or secondary allo-HSCT as a monotherapy or in combination with novel agents or immunotherapy showed limited improvements on long-term survival. Our previous studies have shown that a rare subset of CD4- and CD8- double negative T cells (DNTs) expanded from periphery of healthy donors are effective in targeting AML cells in vitro and in xenograft models. Also, allogeneic DNTs can be used as an off-the-shelf adoptive cellular therapy (ACT) for AML. We undertook a first in-human phase I/IIa trial to assess the safety and efficacy of escalating doses of DNTs for the treatment of AML patients relapsed post allo-HSCT. This study protocol was approved by Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials. Informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-IPR-1900022795). METHODS From June 2019 to June 2020, 12 patients with relapsed AML after allo-HSCT were enrolled in the trials. Three patients received HLA-matched sibling stem cell transplant, and 9 patients received umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Hematological relapse was found in 9 cases, and molecular relapsed in 3 cases. None of the patients were able to obtain DLI from previous donors for various reasons. Clinical-grade DNTs from peripheral blood of healthy donors were expanded. After lymphodepleting chemotherapy with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide, each patient received three infusions of HLA-mismatched DNTs expanded from healthy volunteers at escalating doses of 5×107, 1×108, or 2-4×108 per kilogram of body weight at one week interval. Numbers of total DNTs and donor-derived DNTs, inflammatory cytokines levels in vivo were measured according to the study protocol. Post-remission therapy was permitted 14 days after the last DNTs infusion according to treating physician's discretion. RESULTS All surviving patients were followed until August 1st, 2020. At a median follow-up of 4.3 months (range 1.7 to 12.2 months), 1 patient withdrew from the trial after the second DNT infusion for a personal reason. 6/11 patients (54.5%) achieved complete response (CR) with 5 of these patients negative for (45.4%) minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD). 4/11 patients (36.3%) achieved partial remission. Up to the last follow-up, 4/11 patients remain CR. Increase in the levels of serum inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, TNF-alpha, MCP-1, and MIP-1-beta over baseline were observed without signs of cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, or graft-versus-host disease. The most common adverse events related to DNTs treatment were fever and headache. None of the patients showed >grade 2 adverse event (AE). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Donor DNT cell expansion was detected as early as 6 hours after infusion and reached the peak at 24 hours after the 1st infusion in most patients, slightly increased after the 2nd and 3rd infusions, and lasted for 2 weeks after 3rd infusion. However, total DNTs increased and reached the peak at 2 weeks after 3rd infusion. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that allogeneic DNTs therapy is safe, well tolerated, and potentially effective in treating AML patients who relapsed after allo-HSCT. The total number of DNTs increased after infusion. Compared to other agents, DNTs more effectively induced complete responses in this patient population. Our on-going study is to elucidate the mechanism of DNTs-mediated leukemia clearance, and explore the use of DNTs as carrier for Chimeric Antigen Receptor or transgenic TCR to further enhance the efficacy targeting resistant AML cells. Disclosures Zhang: AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; University Health Network: Consultancy, Current equity holder in private company, Other: Principal Investigator, Patents & Royalties.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».