MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3095967713 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-134460

Five-Year Follow-Up of Ibrutinib Plus Rituximab Vs Placebo Plus Rituximab for Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia: Final Analysis From the Randomized Phase 3 iNNOVATETM Study

2020· article· en· W3095967713 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Christian Buske, Alessandra Tedeschi, Judith Trotman, Ramón García‐Sánz, David MacDonald, Véronique Leblond, Beatrice Mahé, Charles Herbaux, Jeffrey Matous, Constantine S. Tam, Leonard T. Heffner, Marzia Varettoni, M. Lia Palomba, Chaim Shustik, Efstathios Kastritis, Steven P. Treon, Jerry Ping, Bernhard Hauns, Israel Arango‐Hisijara, Meletios Α. Dimopoulos

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill University Health CentreRoyal Victoria Regional Health CentreOttawa HospitalRoyal Victoria HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIbrutinibRituximabMacroglobulinemiaMedicineWaldenstrom macroglobulinemiaInternal medicinePlaceboLymphoplasmacytic LymphomaFludarabineOncologyGastroenterologyLymphomaChronic lymphocytic leukemiaChemotherapyCyclophosphamideLeukemiaMultiple myelomaPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background : Ibrutinib is a once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the US and EU as either a single-agent therapy or in combination with rituximab (R) for treatment of patients (pts) with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) across all lines of therapy. In the phase 3 iNNOVATE study (PCYC-1127; NCT02165397), ibrutinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) in combination with R (IR) vs placebo plus R in pts with WM after a 26.5 mo median follow-up in the primary analysis (Dimopoulos, N Engl J Med 2018). After a 30.4 mo median follow-up, IR continued to show superiority over R in treatment-naive (TN) and previously treated pts with WM, regardless of genomic factors (Buske, ASH 2018). Here, we present results from the final analysis of the randomized arms of iNNOVATE. Methods : Pts with confirmed symptomatic WM requiring treatment were randomized to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg or placebo plus R (375 mg/m2/week IV at weeks 1-4 and 17-20). Pts could be TN or previously treated; pts with prior R therapy had to have achieved at least a minor response (MR) to their last R-based regimen. Endpoints included PFS and response rates per Independent Review Committee (IRC), overall survival (OS), hemoglobin (Hgb) improvement, time to next treatment (TTNT), and safety. Results : Of the 150 pts randomized (75 per arm), baseline characteristics were well balanced between arms. Median follow-up was 50 mo (range 0.5+ to 63). Median PFS was not reached (NR; 95% CI 57.7 mo to not estimable) with IR vs 20.3 mo (95% CI 13.0-27.6) with R (hazard ratio [HR] 0.25 [0.15-0.42]; P<0.0001) (Figure 1A). PFS rates were 68% vs 25% at the 54 mo landmark timepoint. Patients treated with IR also had a PFS benefit over those treated with R, regardless of their prior treatment status (HR [95% CI]: TN, 0.32 [0.14-0.70]; previously treated, 0.22 [0.11-0.43]) or genotype (HR [95% CI]: MYD88L265P/CXCR4WT, 0.18 [0.08-0.43]; MYD88L265P/CXCR4WHIM, 0.27 [0.12-0.62]; MYD88WT/CXCR4WT, 0.29 [0.07-1.19]) (Figure 1B). PFS benefit of IR over R was also observed across prespecified subgroups including baseline age, sex, serum immunoglobulin, Hgb, and IPSSWM. Major response rate (≥partial response) was 76% with IR vs 31% with R (P<0.0001), and overall response rates (≥MR) were 92% vs 44% (P<0.0001). High response rates were observed with IR regardless of prior treatment (91% [31/34] in TN; 93% [38/41] in previously treated) and across genotypes (94% [30/32] in MYD88L265P/CXCR4WT; 100% [26/26] in MYD88L265P/CXCR4WHIM; 82% [9/11] in MYD88WT/CXCR4WT). A greater proportion of pts receiving IR vs R had sustained Hgb improvement (77% vs 43%; P<0.0001). Median OS was NR in either treatment arm; at the 54 mo landmark timepoint, the OS rate was 86% with IR vs 84% with R. Thirty-five pts (47%) on R crossed over to single-agent ibrutinib after IRC-confirmed progressive disease. Median TTNT was NR with IR and 18 mo with R; 87% of pts receiving IR and 29% receiving R had not received subsequent treatment at 54 mo. Treatment has ended for the R arm; median treatment duration was 16 mo and safety results have been previously reported (Buske, ASH 2018). Median treatment duration for IR was 48 mo. Overall, the safety profile of IR is consistent with previous reports; minimal differences (1-4%) in common (≥10%) adverse event (AE) rates were observed after 24 months of additional follow-up since the primary analysis. The most common grade 3-4 AEs (percent in final analysis [difference from primary analysis]) were atrial fibrillation (16% [4%]), hypertension (15% [1%]), neutropenia (13% [4%]), and anemia (12% [1%]). Of 12 pts with grade 3-4 atrial fibrillation, 9 (75%) remained on treatment; no other ibrutinib discontinuations due to common (≥10%) grade 3-4 AEs occurred. After study closure, 68 pts (45%) remained on treatment (32 enrolled in a treatment extension study and 36 continued to receive ibrutinib in a non-trial setting). Conclusions : With up to 5 years of follow-up, IR showed ongoing superiority across clinical outcomes in pts with WM regardless of genotype, prior treatment, and key pt characteristics. Patterns of response with IR were similar for both TN and previously treated pts. IR maintained a manageable safety profile, with no new safety signals identified and minimal increases in common AEs after an additional 24 months of follow-up. Disclosures Buske: Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Janssen, Bayer, MSD: Research Funding; Roche, Janssen, AbbVie, Pfizer, Celltrion: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Tedeschi:Department of Hematology Niguarda Hospital Milano: Current Employment; Janssen spa: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BeiGene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Trotman:BeiGene: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Roche: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. García-Sanz:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; IVS (Biomed 2-Euroclonality): Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property; Gilead: Other: Research grants, Research Funding. MacDonald:AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche Canada: Consultancy, Honoraria. Leblond:AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Lilly: Consultancy. Herbaux:Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Matous:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Tam:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Heffner:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Kite: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Research Funding; Biotest: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding. Varettoni:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Palomba:Novartis: Honoraria; Evelo: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Therakos: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Kite: Honoraria; Seres Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property; Flagship Ventures: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Patents & Royalties: and other intellectual property. Shustik:Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Kastritis:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Genesis Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses. Treon:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company, Janssen, and BeiGene: Consultancy, Other: Travel/accomodations/expenses, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel/accomodations/expenses; Biogene: Consultancy, Other: Travel/accomodations/expenses. Ping:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hauns:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment; AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Arango-Hisijara:AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment. Dimopoulos:BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,054

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,007
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,326
Écart entre enseignants0,289 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations24
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207