MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3096107020 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-142859

A Phase I Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Safety Study of Trph-222 in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R NHL): Dose-Escalation Results

2020· article· en· W3096107020 sur OpenAlexaff
Francisco J. Hernandez‐Ilizaliturri, Ian W. Flinn, John Kuruvilla, Sarit Assouline, Matthew L. Ulrickson, Beth Christian, Daniel J. Landsburg, Monic J. Stuart, Henry B. Lowman, Nancy K. Levin

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Établissements canadiensMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTolerabilityPharmacokineticsAdverse effectPopulationInternal medicineGastroenterologyPhases of clinical researchPharmacodynamicsRefractory (planetary science)Antibody-drug conjugateDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaToxicityPharmacologyLymphomaUrologyAntibodyImmunologyMonoclonal antibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: TRPH-222 is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprised of a humanized anti-CD22 monoclonal antibody and maytansine, a potent anti-mitotic agent, joined by a novel linker-conjugation technology (SMARTag™). This approach enables site-specific conjugation of the maytansine payload while tightly controlling drug:antibody ratio (DAR), resulting in a highly stable anti-CD22 ADC resistant to MDR1-mediated efflux and does not mediate bystander killing. The primary objectives of study TRPH-222-100 are to determine the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TRPH-222 monotherapy in patients with R/R NHL. Methods: TRPH-222-100 is an open-label, multicenter dose-escalation study comprised of a dose-escalation stage followed by a dose-expansion stage. TRPH-222 was administered IV once every 3 wks to the treatment population which included patients with DLBCL, FL, MCL, and MZL in dose-escalation. Single patient cohorts received doses of TRPH-222 starting at 0.6 mg/kg until a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or grade >2 non-hematologic adverse event (AE) occurred, at which time the protocol converted to a 3+3 design. Data are reported here for the completed dose-escalation stage. Results: As of 30Jun2020: 22 patients were enrolled (1 patient each at 0.6, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg; 7 patients at 4.2 mg/kg, 4 patients each at 5.6 and 7.5 mg/kg, 3 patients at 10 mg/kg); 11 indolent (10 FL, 1 MZL) and 11 aggressive histology patients (8 DLBCL, 2 transformed FL, 1 MCL); median age 68 yrs, median number prior therapies 4 (range 1-8) including 5 patients receiving prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant and 4 receiving prior CAR-T treatment. Two DLTs (Grade 3 and 4 transaminase elevations; one each at 4.2 and 10 mg/kg) have occurred. Other treatment-related grade ≥ 3 AEs include (see table below): No treatment-related Grade 5 toxicities or serious AEs have occurred. Two instances of peripheral neuropathy have been reported; one Grade 2 event increased from baseline Grade 1 (end of Cycle 4), and one Grade 1 event (Cycle 1) in a patient with a history of neuropathic pain. Ten patients (2.0 to 10 mg/kg) have experienced Grade 1 or 2 ocular events, most frequently presenting in Cycles 1-3 as blurred vision and/or dry eyes, which have resolved to ≤ Grade 1 with dose interruptions and reductions, and lubricant eye drops. The PK profile of TRPH-222 showed a long serum half-life (~5-10 days after first dose), with no unconjugated maytansine detected in samples assessed to date (up to 7.5 mg/kg, assay detection limit 100 pg/mL). No anti-drug antibodies have been detected in samples analyzed to date. Peripheral B-cells were reduced 50-75% after TRPH-222 administration at all dose levels, and 100% CD22 receptor occupancy (assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells) was observed at all dose levels. Eleven of the 22 patients remain on study; study discontinuations have been due to progressive disease (n=7; 3 DLBCL, 2 TFL, 2 FL), DLT (n=2; 1 FL, 1 DLBCL), and investigator decision (n=2; 1 DLBCL, 1 FL). Five complete responses (CR: 3 FL, 1 DLBCL, 1 MCL) and one partial response (PR: FL) have been observed at doses from 0.6 to 5.6 mg/kg at the end of cycle 6. Four patients with CRs confirmed at the end of cycle 9 are now off treatment and continuing to be followed for safety and response durability. Remaining patients on study at the data cutoff were in Stable Disease or not yet evaluated for response; data will be updated at the time of presentation. Conclusions: TRPH-222 monotherapy is well tolerated through dose-escalation to 10 mg/kg, with a low incidence of AEs commonly associated with ADCs such as thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy. The most common AEs included low grade and manageable ocular findings consistent with known epithelial keratopathy of ADCs bearing microtubule inhibitors. These data, together with 100% CD22 receptor occupancy observed at all dose levels, and CRs/PRs observed at doses levels less than 10 mg/kg, support further assessment of TRPH-222 monotherapy in an expansion cohort currently enrolling R/R FL and DLBCL patients. These results support further clinical studies of TRPH-222, including combinations with other antitumor agents in B-cell lymphoma patients. Table Disclosures Hernandez-Ilizaliturri: Epyzome: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy. Flinn:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Iksuda Therapeutics: Consultancy; Great Point Partners: Consultancy; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Nurix Therapeutics: Consultancy; Curis: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Consultancy, Research Funding; Curio Science: Consultancy; Constellation Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Calithera Biosciences: Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; ArQule: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; IGM Biosciences: Research Funding; Vincera Pharma: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Other; Rhizen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Yingli Pharmaceuticals ≠: Consultancy, Research Funding; Verastem: Consultancy, Research Funding; Triphase Research & Development Corp.: Research Funding; Trillium Therapeutics: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kuruvilla:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Antengene: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Assouline:F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Christian:Merck: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; MorphoSys: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; F Hoffman-La Roche: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Verastem: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZenica: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Landsburg:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Curis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morphosys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; Triphase: Research Funding. Stuart:Integral Medicines Inc: Consultancy; Cleave Therapeutics Inc: Consultancy; Revolution Medicines Inc: Consultancy; RegImmune Corp: Consultancy; IgM Biosciences: Consultancy; Portola Pharmaceuticals Inc: Consultancy; Artiva Biotherapeutics: Consultancy; Gilead Sciences Inc: Consultancy; Theravance Biopharma: Consultancy; Triphase Accelerator US Corp: Consultancy. Lowman:Triphase Accelerator US Corp: Consultancy. Levin:Triphase Accelerator US Corp: Current Employment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,290 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations17
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchTravaux en français237 207