First Report of Cherry Virus F Infecting Japanese Plum in Korea
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cherry virus F (CVF) is a tentative member of the genus Fabavirus in the family Secoviridae, consisting of two RNA segments (Koloniuk et al. 2018). To date, CVF has been documented in only sweet cherry (Prunus avium) in the Czech Republic (Koloniuk et al. 2018), Canada, and Greece. In May 2014, we collected leaf samples from four symptomatic (leaf spots and dapple fruits) and two asymptomatic Japanese plum cultivars (Sun and Gadam) grown in an orchard in Hoengseong, South Korea, to identify viruses and viroids infecting plum trees. Total RNA from individual plum trees was extracted using two commercial kits: Fruit-mate for RNA Purification Kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan) and RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). We generated six mRNA libraries from the six different plum cultivars for RNA-sequencing using the TruSeq RNA Library Preparation Kit v2 (Illumina, CA, U.S.A.) as described previously (Jo et al. 2017). The mRNA libraries were paired-end (2 X 100 bp) sequenced with a HiSeq 2000 system (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). The raw sequence reads were de novo assembled by Trinity program v. 2.8.6, with default parameters (Haas et al. 2013). The assembled contigs were subjected to BLASTX search against the non-redundant protein database in NCBI. Of the two asymptomatic cultivars, the transcriptome of asymptomatic plum cv. Gadam contained five contigs specific to CVF. Two and three contigs were specific to CVF RNA1 (2,571 reads, coverage 42.15%) and RNA2 (2,025 reads, coverage 53.04%), respectively. The size of these five contigs ranged from 241 to 5,986 bp. Contigs of 5,986 and 3,867 bp in length, referred to as CVF isolate Gadam RNA1 (GenBank MN896996) and RNA2 (GenBank MN896995), respectively, were subjected to BLASTP search against NCBI's non-redundant protein database. The results showed that the polyprotein sequences of RNA1 and RNA2 shared 95.3% and 93.11% amino acid identities with isolates SwC-H_1a from the Czech Republic (GenBank acc. no. AWB36326) and Stac-3B_c8 from Canada (AZZ10055), respectively. To confirm the infection of CVF in cv. Gadam, RT-PCR was conducted using CVF RNA1-specific primers designed based on the CVF reference genome sequences (MH998210 and MH998216), including 5'-CCACCAAATAGGCAAGAGGTCAC-3' (position 3190-3212) and 5'-CACAATCACCATCAATGGTCTCTGC-3' (position 3742-3766), and CVF RNA2-specific primers, including 5'-CTGCTTTATGATGCTAGACATCAAGATG-3' (position 1015-1042) and 5'-ACAATAGGCATGCTCATCTCAACCTC-3' (position 1594-1619). We amplified 577-bp RNA1-specific and 605-bp RNA2-specific amplicons that were cloned and then performed Sanger sequencing. Sequencing of the cloned amplicons for isolate Gadam RNA1 (GenBank MN896993) and RNA2 (GenBank MN896994) revealed values of 99.48% and 99.17% nucleotide identity to that of RNA1 and RNA2 determined by high-throughput sequencing, respectively. Additionally, we tested five plants for each of the six plum cultivars grown in the same orchard. The detection of CVF was carried out through PCR using the primers and protocol described above. Of the 30 trees, CVF was detected in three trees of cv. Gadam by both primer pairs. To our knowledge, this is the first report of CVF infecting Japanese plum and the first report of the virus in Korea. However, its prevalence in other Prunus species, including apricot, European plum, and peach, should be further elucidated.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».