First Report of Cherry Virus F Infecting Japanese Plum in Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cherry virus F (CVF) is a tentative member of the genus Fabavirus in the family Secoviridae, consisting of two RNA segments (Koloniuk et al. 2018). To date, CVF has been documented in only sweet cherry (Prunus avium) in the Czech Republic (Koloniuk et al. 2018), Canada, and Greece. In May 2014, we collected leaf samples from four symptomatic (leaf spots and dapple fruits) and two asymptomatic Japanese plum cultivars (Sun and Gadam) grown in an orchard in Hoengseong, South Korea, to identify viruses and viroids infecting plum trees. Total RNA from individual plum trees was extracted using two commercial kits: Fruit-mate for RNA Purification Kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan) and RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). We generated six mRNA libraries from the six different plum cultivars for RNA-sequencing using the TruSeq RNA Library Preparation Kit v2 (Illumina, CA, U.S.A.) as described previously (Jo et al. 2017). The mRNA libraries were paired-end (2 X 100 bp) sequenced with a HiSeq 2000 system (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). The raw sequence reads were de novo assembled by Trinity program v. 2.8.6, with default parameters (Haas et al. 2013). The assembled contigs were subjected to BLASTX search against the non-redundant protein database in NCBI. Of the two asymptomatic cultivars, the transcriptome of asymptomatic plum cv. Gadam contained five contigs specific to CVF. Two and three contigs were specific to CVF RNA1 (2,571 reads, coverage 42.15%) and RNA2 (2,025 reads, coverage 53.04%), respectively. The size of these five contigs ranged from 241 to 5,986 bp. Contigs of 5,986 and 3,867 bp in length, referred to as CVF isolate Gadam RNA1 (GenBank MN896996) and RNA2 (GenBank MN896995), respectively, were subjected to BLASTP search against NCBI's non-redundant protein database. The results showed that the polyprotein sequences of RNA1 and RNA2 shared 95.3% and 93.11% amino acid identities with isolates SwC-H_1a from the Czech Republic (GenBank acc. no. AWB36326) and Stac-3B_c8 from Canada (AZZ10055), respectively. To confirm the infection of CVF in cv. Gadam, RT-PCR was conducted using CVF RNA1-specific primers designed based on the CVF reference genome sequences (MH998210 and MH998216), including 5'-CCACCAAATAGGCAAGAGGTCAC-3' (position 3190-3212) and 5'-CACAATCACCATCAATGGTCTCTGC-3' (position 3742-3766), and CVF RNA2-specific primers, including 5'-CTGCTTTATGATGCTAGACATCAAGATG-3' (position 1015-1042) and 5'-ACAATAGGCATGCTCATCTCAACCTC-3' (position 1594-1619). We amplified 577-bp RNA1-specific and 605-bp RNA2-specific amplicons that were cloned and then performed Sanger sequencing. Sequencing of the cloned amplicons for isolate Gadam RNA1 (GenBank MN896993) and RNA2 (GenBank MN896994) revealed values of 99.48% and 99.17% nucleotide identity to that of RNA1 and RNA2 determined by high-throughput sequencing, respectively. Additionally, we tested five plants for each of the six plum cultivars grown in the same orchard. The detection of CVF was carried out through PCR using the primers and protocol described above. Of the 30 trees, CVF was detected in three trees of cv. Gadam by both primer pairs. To our knowledge, this is the first report of CVF infecting Japanese plum and the first report of the virus in Korea. However, its prevalence in other Prunus species, including apricot, European plum, and peach, should be further elucidated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".