MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3096609892 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-133355

Preliminary Safety, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Subcutaneously (SC) Administered PF-06863135, a B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA)-CD3 Bispecific Antibody, in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

2020· article· en· W3096609892 sur OpenAlexaff
Alexander M. Lesokhin, Moshe Levy, Andrew Dalovisio, Nizar J. Bahlis, Melhem Solh, Michaël Sébag, Andrzej Jakubowiak, Yogesh Jethava, Caitlin Costello, Michael P. Chu, Michael R. Savona, Cristina Gasparetto, Suzanne Trudel, Jeffrey Chou, Chandrasekhar Udata, Cynthia Basu, Heike I. Krupka, Noopur Raje

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkInstitute of Cancer ResearchUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsRefractory (planetary science)Multiple myelomaAntibodyPharmacologyAntigenInternal medicineOncologyImmunology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction: PF-06863135 (PF-3135) is a full-length, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody (mAb, IgG2a) targeting BCMA, which is highly expressed on multiple myeloma cells, and CD3 expressed on T cells. Intravenous (IV) dosing of PF-3135 has been previously evaluated at 0.1 - 50 μg/kg weekly with preliminary evidence of anti-myeloma activity in RRMM, without reaching the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). SC dose escalation was subsequently initiated given the potential to reduce the maximum concentration (Cmax), which is believed to be associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and inflammatory response, with the intent of achieving a more favorable therapeutic window. Methods: Patients with RRMM previously treated with immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 mAb received SC dosages of PF-3135 at 80, 130, 215, and 360 μg/kg weekly. A modified toxicity probability interval method was used for dose escalation, with dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) monitored in the first cycle (21 days). AEs were graded by CTCAE criteria except CRS, which was graded by Lee et al. 2014 criteria. Responses were assessed at the end of each cycle by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Peripheral blood was evaluated for soluble BCMA, cytokines, and immunophenotyping. PF-3135 pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity were also characterized. Results: As of April 15, 2020, 18 patients had received PF-3135 SC at 80 (n=6), 130 (n=4), 215 (n=4) and 360 (n=4) μg/kg weekly. The median number of prior anticancer treatment regimens was 7; all patients had received prior daratumumab therapy; 4 (22%) patients had received prior BCMA-targeted antibody-drug conjugate or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. All patients completed the DLT-monitoring period and none were observed. At cut-off date, dose escalation was ongoing with MTD not reached. All patients experienced treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs); the most common were CRS reported in 11 (61%) patients, anemia in 9 (50%), thrombocytopenia in 7 (39%), and injection site reaction and lymphopenia in 6 (33% each). Grade (G) 3-4 TEAEs were observed in 12 (67%) patients, including G3 anemia in 8 (44%), G3 thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, hypoalbuminemia, and bone pain in 2 (11% each), G4 lymphopenia in 4 (22%), G4 thrombocytopenia in 3 (17%), and G4 neutropenia in 2 (11%) patients. G5 TEAEs occurring in 3 (17%) patients (80 μg/kg group) were considered not treatment-related (disease progression [n=2] and sepsis [n=1]). CRS, the most common treatment-related AE, was observed across all dose levels in 11 patients (61% overall; 50% at 80 and 130 µg/kg; 75% at 215 and 360 µg/kg). Of these, 9 (50%) patients experienced G1 CRS and 2 (11%) had G2 CRS. CRS began within the first 2 days of treatment, with a median duration of 2 days (range 0-4). Per IMWG criteria, the objective response rate was 33% in the overall SC-dosed population and 75% at the top 2 dose levels (215 and 360 μg/kg). Two patients each achieved a best response of partial response (PR), very good PR (VGPR), and stringent complete response (sCR). Seven patients had best response of stable disease. Exposure to PF-3135 increased with dose in an approximately dose-proportional manner. SC administration resulted in a lower dose-normalized Cmax relative to IV administration and a prolonged absorption phase, with median time to Cmax ranging from 3 to 7 days. Consistent with the observed CRS, cytokine increases were the highest following the first dose and diminished significantly at subsequent doses. Levels of free, soluble BCMA decreased with increasing doses and demonstrated sustained decreases throughout each dose interval. Conclusions: AEs were generally manageable; CRS reported in the majority of patients was grade 1-2. Responses were achieved with SC dosing of PF-3135 in 6 of 8 (75%) patients at the 2 highest dose levels evaluated. Compared to IV, SC dosing did modulate the Cmax, so higher doses could be administered without observing increased severity of CRS. SC dose escalation is ongoing and additional results, including biomarkers and data from higher dose cohorts, will be presented. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03269136. Funding: Pfizer. Disclosures Lesokhin: Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria; GenMab: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Serametrix Inc.: Patents & Royalties. Levy:Baylor University Med Center: Current Employment; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Meyers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bahlis:Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS/Celgene and Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accomodations, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Solh:Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Partner Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Sebag:Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Jakubowiak:AbbVie, Amgen, BMS/Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive, Juno: Consultancy, Honoraria. Costello:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Poseida Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Chu:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Teva: Consultancy, Honoraria. Savona:Boehringer Ingelheim: Patents & Royalties; Ryvu: Consultancy; Astex: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Gilead: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Trudel:Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria. Chou:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Udata:Pfizer: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Basu:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Krupka:Pfizer: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Raje:Immuneel: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Caribou: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy; Astrazeneca: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Bluebird, Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: BCMA/CD3 bi-specific antibody in development for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,267
Écart entre enseignants0,252 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations32
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207