Factual Error Correction for Abstractive Summarization Models
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Neural abstractive summarization systems have achieved promising progress, thanks to the availability of large-scale datasets and models pre-trained with self-supervised methods.However, ensuring the factual consistency of the generated summaries for abstractive summarization systems is a challenge.We propose a post-editing corrector module to address this issue by identifying and correcting factual errors in generated summaries.The neural corrector model is pre-trained on artificial examples that are created by applying a series of heuristic transformations on reference summaries.These transformations are inspired by an error analysis of state-of-the-art summarization model outputs.Experimental results show that our model is able to correct factual errors in summaries generated by other neural summarization models and outperforms previous models on factual consistency evaluation on the CNN/DailyMail dataset.We also find that transferring from artificial error correction to downstream settings is still very challenging 1 .Article: Jerusalem (CNN)The flame of remembrance burns in Jerusalem, and a song of memory haunts Valerie Braham as it never has before.(...) "Now I truly understand everyone who has lost a loved one," Braham said.Her husband, Philippe Braham, was one of 17 people killed in January's terror attacks in Paris.He was in a kosher supermarket when a gunman stormed in, killing four people, all of them Jewish.(...) Original: Valerie braham was one of 17 people killed in january's terror attacks in paris.(inconsistent) Corrected: Philippe braham was one of 17 people killed in january's terror attacks in paris.(consistent) Article: (...) Thursday's attack by al-Shabaab militants killed 147 people, including 142 students, three security officers and two university security personnel.The attack left 104 people injured, including 19 who are in critical condition, Nkaissery said.(...) Original: 147 people, including 142 students, are in critical condition.(inconsistent) Corrected: 19 people, including 142 students, are in critical condition.(inconsistent) Article: (CNN) Officer Michael Slager's five-year career with the North Charleston Police Department in South Carolina ended after he resorted to deadly force following a routine traffic stop.(...) His back is to Slager, who, from a few yards away, raises his gun and fires.Slager is now charged with murder.The FBI is involved in the investigation of the slaying of the father of four.(...) Original: Slager is now charged with murder.(consistent) Corrected: Michael Slager is now charged with murder.(consistent) Article: (CNN)The announcement this year of a new, original Dr. Seuss book sent a wave of nostalgic giddiness across Twitter, and months before publication, the number of pre-orders for "What Pet Should I Get?" continues to climb.(...) It features the spirited siblings from the beloved classic "One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish" and is believed to have been written between 1958 and 1962.(...) Original: Seuss book sent a wave of nostalgic giddiness across twitter.(consistent) Corrected: "One Fish Two Fish Red Fish Blue Fish" book sent a wave of nostalgic giddiness across twitter.(inconsistent)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».