MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W310273423

Making and Remaking Class in Ken Loach's Recent Films

2003· article· en· W310273423 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Scott Forsyth

Notice bibliographique

RevueCineaction! · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMilitantWorking classPoliticsMovie theaterPower (physics)Gender studiesFilm directorSociologyAestheticsRealismOppressionArtHistoryLawArt historyPolitical scienceLiterature
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Ken Loach has always been a favourite of the Toronto International Film festival. In 1991, he was featured with a complete retrospective and his new films premiere each year, celebrated at festivals though not often theatrically released. Of course, Loach does not fit the cynical right wing times, he is the master filmmaker of the working class, and his militant socialism has never wavered. His extraordinary body of work over 40 years--Cathy Come Home, Kes, the magisterial Days of Hope, Hidden Agenda, Riff-Raff, Ladybird, Ladybird, and Land and Freedom, to name just a few--offers a panoramic but intimate exploration of working class politics and everyday life, particularly in the British isles, but always internationally conscious as well. Loach's films have powerfully addressed the politics and betrayals of unions, strikes and revolutions, the painful daily struggles with family, sexuality, race, housing, poverty, drugs and alcohol, the contradictions and inhumanity of the welfare state, the solidarity and oppression of the workplace; every aspect of working class life interests his humane realism. That realism has outlasted the censorship battles that marked so many of his early television films and has survived in its power and popularity despite the ignominious targeting of Loach by the sectarian Screen Theorists of the seventies. Loach's is a cinema of emotion and analysis, sometimes didactic (and that is not always a bad thing), always partisan. But victories are few and far between, triumphs often solely of working class spirit against overwhelming odds. Over the last decade, Loach's films have repeatedly come back to the ravages of and struggles against the ruling class offensive known as neo-liberalism. The attack on working people's living standards, wages and unions, the relentless erosion of the social, health and educational provisions of the so-called welfare state, the polarization of rich and poor, the familiar mantras of privatization, deregulation, free market magic are all too well known. If this onslaught is still emblematized by Thatcher and Reagan, it is now generalized as blatantly imperialist globalization, borne by the World Bank, the IMF and American military might. Loach's films of the last few years have looked prismatically at where working people stand in this epochal change and the restructuring of class relations, from the workers' eyes. Bread and Roses (2000) is set within a recent victory, at least partially, for working class struggle: the successful organization and strike by janitors in California, largely illegal Mexican immigrants. The film is a celebration of class militance against the brutal new conditions of Iowpay contingent service work, but characteristically Loach focuses as much on the personal costs and pain of that struggle. The Navigators (2001) takes us right within the heart of Thatcherite Britain, to the virtual opposite of the California optimism of the janitors' small triumph. The film offers a series of tableau's among the workers of a British Rail maintenance crew. The narrative spine is provided by the privatization of this public corporation, a legacy Blair has continued to pursue despite years of accidents and scandals. The film centres on the relationships among the men and a few women in the workplace. Written by a former rail worker, the stories give viewers a privileged access to what the day's work is like, what workers talk about, how they act with each other, how they fight and joke. But this goes beyond a simple idea of naturalism. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,041
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,082

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,006
Communication savante0,0100,003
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,079
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,185 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCineaction!→Même sujetCinema and Media Studies→Travaux en français237 207→