Phillip Buckner, Remembering 1759: The Conquest of Canada in Historical Memory
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
These volumes were published in the wake of of '1759 Revisited: The Conquest of Canada in Historical Perspective,' a conference which was held at the University of London for the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham.While this particular volume is a collection of papers related to "historical memory" of this event, the second, Revisiting 1759: The Conquest of Canada in Historical Perspective, is focused on "the Conquest and its immediate aftermath" (vii-viii).Remembering 1759 contains a helpful, editor-penned introduction which situates the Conquest in its historical context as well as gives an overview of its "historical memory," thus providing readers with entry points into the eleven papers contained in this collection.The articles are presented in roughly chronological order, from reactions in England and Canada in the immediate aftermath of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham to considerations on how this watershed is approached and in a modern context and how it could be dealt with in the future.Although these articles are not, of course, completely comprehensive in their scope -they do not contain the memory of every group and individual at every time with regard to the Conquest, for example, --they do nonetheless cover a remarkable amount of ground, and as a collection they pay tribute to concerned intellectuals and public figures such as Abbé Lionel Groulx and Denis Vaugeois as well as groups involved the Conquest's fallout such as Native Americans, representatives of the French government, and Quebecer separatists.By way of making this material topical, and provocative, most of the articles refer to the controversy that surrounded the commemoration of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham in 2009.One might venture to say that many of the participants at '1759 Revisited' were propelled to better their understanding of the Conquest because of its strong influence on current Canadian politics, activism, and psyche.This indicates that, in addition to being united in their questioning of historical memory related to the Conquest, many of these articles are an implicit or explicit attempt to respond to this question: "Why is the Conquest still such a hot-button issue in Canada?"In working through responses to this question, authors plumb the great variety of ways in which the Battle of the Plains of Abraham has been viewed, and thereby provide a sense of the ability of politicians, among many others, to use an historical event to very different, and at times contradictory, reasons.As Joan Coutu and John McAleer remark in "'The Immortal Wolfe'?Monuments, Memory, and the Battle of Quebec," "[t]he historical understandings and interpretations of the Battle of Quebec for different groups were structured by the prevailing political exigencies of the time in which they were created" (29).One of the most striking contradictions in the interpretation of the Conquest lie in its simultaneous symbolism of unification between the inheritors of French and British cultures, as well as the division of those same groups.In other words, it has thus been a tool for appeasing the francophone population who find themselves under British rule and majority Anglophone rule as well as a rallying cry for the increased power and autonomy of Quebec.The many reactions to the Battle of the Plains of Abraham highlight the idea that accounts of history are always colored and subjective.Just as this volume demonstrates that the meaning of a historical event is shaped by a person's identity, my reaction to Remembering 1759 is a result of my own background and interests.As someone whose exposure to Canadian history has been minimal, and cliché-ridden, this focused, rich picture of a significant point in my northern neighbor's past was quite captivating.By the time I closed this book after an initial reading, I had gained a keen insight into the complex divisions between Quebec and the rest of the Canadian provinces, between the Francophone and Anglophone populations of Canada.I would recommend this well-crafted and well-written volume as an excellent read for those interested in deepening their knowledge of historical memory, colonialism and its repercussions, the movement for independence in Quebec, Canadian government, French colonialism, and Canadian and Quebec history in general.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».