MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3113324464 · doi:10.15695/amqst.v10i1.3817

Phillip Buckner, Remembering 1759: The Conquest of Canada in Historical Memory

2013· article· en· W3113324464 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sarah Kiningham

Bibliographic record

VenueAmeriQuests · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCONQUESTHistoryAncient history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

These volumes were published in the wake of of '1759 Revisited: The Conquest of Canada in Historical Perspective,' a conference which was held at the University of London for the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham.While this particular volume is a collection of papers related to "historical memory" of this event, the second, Revisiting 1759: The Conquest of Canada in Historical Perspective, is focused on "the Conquest and its immediate aftermath" (vii-viii).Remembering 1759 contains a helpful, editor-penned introduction which situates the Conquest in its historical context as well as gives an overview of its "historical memory," thus providing readers with entry points into the eleven papers contained in this collection.The articles are presented in roughly chronological order, from reactions in England and Canada in the immediate aftermath of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham to considerations on how this watershed is approached and in a modern context and how it could be dealt with in the future.Although these articles are not, of course, completely comprehensive in their scope -they do not contain the memory of every group and individual at every time with regard to the Conquest, for example, --they do nonetheless cover a remarkable amount of ground, and as a collection they pay tribute to concerned intellectuals and public figures such as Abbé Lionel Groulx and Denis Vaugeois as well as groups involved the Conquest's fallout such as Native Americans, representatives of the French government, and Quebecer separatists.By way of making this material topical, and provocative, most of the articles refer to the controversy that surrounded the commemoration of the Battle of the Plains of Abraham in 2009.One might venture to say that many of the participants at '1759 Revisited' were propelled to better their understanding of the Conquest because of its strong influence on current Canadian politics, activism, and psyche.This indicates that, in addition to being united in their questioning of historical memory related to the Conquest, many of these articles are an implicit or explicit attempt to respond to this question: "Why is the Conquest still such a hot-button issue in Canada?"In working through responses to this question, authors plumb the great variety of ways in which the Battle of the Plains of Abraham has been viewed, and thereby provide a sense of the ability of politicians, among many others, to use an historical event to very different, and at times contradictory, reasons.As Joan Coutu and John McAleer remark in "'The Immortal Wolfe'?Monuments, Memory, and the Battle of Quebec," "[t]he historical understandings and interpretations of the Battle of Quebec for different groups were structured by the prevailing political exigencies of the time in which they were created" (29).One of the most striking contradictions in the interpretation of the Conquest lie in its simultaneous symbolism of unification between the inheritors of French and British cultures, as well as the division of those same groups.In other words, it has thus been a tool for appeasing the francophone population who find themselves under British rule and majority Anglophone rule as well as a rallying cry for the increased power and autonomy of Quebec.The many reactions to the Battle of the Plains of Abraham highlight the idea that accounts of history are always colored and subjective.Just as this volume demonstrates that the meaning of a historical event is shaped by a person's identity, my reaction to Remembering 1759 is a result of my own background and interests.As someone whose exposure to Canadian history has been minimal, and cliché-ridden, this focused, rich picture of a significant point in my northern neighbor's past was quite captivating.By the time I closed this book after an initial reading, I had gained a keen insight into the complex divisions between Quebec and the rest of the Canadian provinces, between the Francophone and Anglophone populations of Canada.I would recommend this well-crafted and well-written volume as an excellent read for those interested in deepening their knowledge of historical memory, colonialism and its repercussions, the movement for independence in Quebec, Canadian government, French colonialism, and Canadian and Quebec history in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.217
Threshold uncertainty score0.437

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0140.007
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmeriQuestsSame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207