MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3119320845 · doi:10.51644/nffd2571

Contemporary Repercussions of Historical Discrimination

2020· article· en· W3119320845 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kimberly Spevack

Notice bibliographique

RevueConsensus · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

hroughout history, Jewish and Indigenous people in Canada have faced copious amounts of discrimination, intimidation, and cruel treatment based on their racial and cultural identities.Remnants of lies and stereotypes originating back in the fourth century about Jews have persisted, playing a role in the Holocaust, as well as present-day antisemitism.Indigenous people have been consistently mistreated and considered secondclass citizens by the Canadian government for years, particularly indicated by the implementation of residential schools.Consequently, trauma plagues their community to this day.Both minority groups of people are faced with the lingering consequences of the horrendous events which their ancestors were subjected to, as well as present-day racism and bigotry.Jewish people have been subjected to antisemitism and persecution repeatedly, with many attempts made to destroy the Jews.Why the Jews explains the depth and consistency of antisemitism."In most societies in which Jews have lived, they have at some time been subjected to beatings, torture, and murder solely because they were Jews" (Prager and Telushkin 2016, 26).Jews were often disliked on the basis that they upheld their own customs and traditions, which prevented them from fully integrating into whichever society they were a part of.However, in the case of early Christianity, the presence of Jews posed a different problem than non-conformity.The Jewish people rejected Jesus' claim to be the Messiah, and the Jews were G-d's chosen people, so "if Judaism remained valid, [the founders of Christianity] believed, then Christianity was invalid" (Prager and Telushkin 2016, 117).The depiction that the Jews killed Jesus is one of the accusations that came from the early church's efforts to invalidate the Jewish people, a charge that "gave legitimacy to the brutalizing of Jews for more than 1,500 years in Christian Europe" (118).The depiction of Jews as "Christ-killers" and the associations between the Jews and the Devil led to even more antisemitic libels, which prevailed and hurt Jews for centuries to come.In the Middle Ages, to many Christians, Jews were considered the devil's children, and thus not actually human beings (Prager and Telushkin 2016, 121).This dehumanizing accusation led to absurd anti-Jewish libels, where the Jews were said to perform ritual murder, poison Christians, as well as "host desecration", which represented the death of Christ.These three libels resulted in the persecution of Jews in Europe and paved the way for antisemitism in Christianity.Though Christian antisemitism is not directly the cause of the Holocaust, it played a role in allowing it to occur.Prager and Telushkin note, "the Christian worlds dehumanized the Jew, ultimately helping lay the groundwork for the Holocaust" (Prager and Telushkin 2016, 133).Libels and rumors concerning the Jewish people have not ceased to exist but have morphed into modern day stereotypes and conspiracy theories.A recent example is the influence of the notoriously antisemitic Louis Farrakhan, who gave a speech in which he calls the Jews "Satan", and deems Jewish people to be the "enemy of God" (Pink 2020).Many prominent athletes and entertainers attended Farrakhan's speech, and have since expressed their support for antisemitic conspiracy theories concerning the role of Jewish people in the media and banks in particular.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,916
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,329

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,135
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,101 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueConsensusMême sujetHistorical and Contemporary Political DynamicsTravaux en français237 207