Equipping global health trainees for the climate crisis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The climate crisis is a global public health crisis that emerging leaders in global health are not adequately equipped to confront. Recognising the gap between global health training and the demands of the climate crisis, we hosted a workshop at the 2020 Canadian Conference on Global Health, which was themed Global Health in a Changing Climate, held on Oct 19–21, 2020. Led by trainees, our 1 h workshop for trainees used a peer engagement model to discuss and reflect on ways trainees can transform global health training to protect people and the planet. Our approach was grounded in planetary health, an integrative paradigm exploring the complex dynamics between the health of people and the natural systems on which life depends.1Whitmee S Haines A Beyrer C et al.Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary health.Lancet. 2015; 386: 1973-2028Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (875) Google Scholar Collectively, we charted a course for how to best meet planetary health challenges in the work we do, how we act, and what we learn. The virtual workshop was attended by 32 participants representing five of the six WHO regions. An introductory poll revealed that although 74% of participants were aware of planetary health, only 26% actively engaged it in their research or curriculum. Participants also noted that global health training offers little compulsory planetary health competencies. By contrast, other health disciplines, notably medicine, have pledged to act and embedded planetary health in their curricula.2Hackett F Got T Kitching GT MacQueen K Cohen A Training Canadian doctors for the health challenges of climate change.Lancet Planet Health. 2020; 4: e2-e3Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (13) Google Scholar, 3Wabnitz KJ Gabrysch S Guinto R et al.A pledge for planetary health to unite health professionals in the Anthropocene.Lancet. 2020; 396: 1471-1473Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar From this discussion-based workshop, we identified four actionable recommendations for global health programmes to better equip trainees for planetary health. First, engage early, often, and consistently in teaching planetary health concepts; to this end, trainees offered the Sustainable Development Goals as valuable signposts for curricula development. Second, embrace systems thinking and transdisciplinary perspectives; trainees recognised the complexity of planetary health challenges and wanted to engage across disciplines towards solutions. Third, prioritise planetary health research. There is a need to reform the practice of global health to reduce emissions while also promoting greater equity and decolonisation in what and how we research. Funding bodies and institutions must also offer greater incentives and support for planetary health trainees and research topics. Finally, engage with the knowledge systems of Indigenous communities. Trainees spoke of how planetary health has been embedded in Indigenous communities and wanted to learn from the global collective of Indigenous knowledge towards environmental stewardship. Our global health research communities and training institutions must review, reflect on, and redesign the ways in which we promote and preserve planetary health. The evidence is clear, the demand is high, and the time is now. We declare no competing interests. VH and IB contributed equally. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation–Lancet Commission on planetary healthFar-reaching changes to the structure and function of the Earth's natural systems represent a growing threat to human health. And yet, global health has mainly improved as these changes have gathered pace. What is the explanation? As a Commission, we are deeply concerned that the explanation is straightforward and sobering: we have been mortgaging the health of future generations to realise economic and development gains in the present. By unsustainably exploiting nature's resources, human civilisation has flourished but now risks substantial health effects from the degradation of nature's life support systems in the future. Full-Text PDF
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».