Bimekizumab Safety in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Analysis of Pooled Data from Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ConclusionsBimekizumab was well-tolerated across the plaque psoriasis clinical program; most TEAEs were mild to moderate and discontinuations were low.All candida infections were mucocutaneous in origin, with oral candidiasis being most frequent; oral candidiasis TEAEs were predominantly mild to moderate and the vast majority did not lead to discontinuation. ObjectiveTo report short-and longer-term safety data in bimekizumab-treated patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis pooled from eight phase 2/3 trials. Background• Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A.1,2 • Given that psoriasis is a chronic disease requiring long-term management, it is important to understand the long-term safety profiles of therapies such as bimekizumab.• We report short-and longer-term safety data in bimekizumab-treated patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and short-term data from adalimumab, ustekinumab, and placebo phase 3 comparator arms. Methods• Patients were included from four phase 3 trials -BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and the BE BRIGHT open-label extension (interim cut: November 1, 2019)and four phase 2 studies -BE ABLE 1, BE ABLE 2, PS0016, and PS0018.Patients received bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W; additional doses used in phase 2), adalimumab, ustekinumab, or placebo.• Short-term safety from the initial treatment periods (Weeks 0-16) of three of the phase 3 trials (BE SURE, BE VIVID, and BE READY) was evaluated for patients who received ≥1 dose of bimekizumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, or placebo.• Longer-term safety was also evaluated for patients who received ≥1 dose of bimekizumab in BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, BE BRIGHT, and the four phase 2 trials.• We report treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs; n [%]) for the initial treatment period for patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and placebo, as well as longer-term TEAEs for patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W and all other doses of bimekizumab.-Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) are the incidence of new cases per 100 patient-years (PY) in patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (short-term) and all patients receiving any dose of bimekizumab (longer-term).-TEAEs were coded using MedDRA v19.0. Results Patient Population• Over 16 weeks, 989 patients with psoriasis received ≥1 bimekizumab dose, 159 patients received adalimumab, 163 patients received ustekinumab, and 169 patients received placebo.• Patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics are reported in Table 1. Short-Term Safety Outcomes• 593 (60.0%) bimekizumab-treated patients experienced ≥1 TEAE, versus 96 (60.4%) adalimumab-treated patients, 83 (50.9%) ustekinumab-treated patients, and 74 (43.8%) placebo-treated patients (Table 2).• Serious TEAEs occurred in <4% of patients in each treatment group, ranging from 1.5% for bimekizumab to 3.1% for ustekinumab.• Discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred in <5% of patients in each group, ranging from 1.7% for bimekizumab to 4.1% for placebo (Table 2).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».