Bimekizumab Safety in Patients with Moderate to Severe Psoriasis: Analysis of Pooled Data from Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ConclusionsBimekizumab was well-tolerated across the plaque psoriasis clinical program; most TEAEs were mild to moderate and discontinuations were low.All candida infections were mucocutaneous in origin, with oral candidiasis being most frequent; oral candidiasis TEAEs were predominantly mild to moderate and the vast majority did not lead to discontinuation. ObjectiveTo report short-and longer-term safety data in bimekizumab-treated patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis pooled from eight phase 2/3 trials. Background• Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A.1,2 • Given that psoriasis is a chronic disease requiring long-term management, it is important to understand the long-term safety profiles of therapies such as bimekizumab.• We report short-and longer-term safety data in bimekizumab-treated patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and short-term data from adalimumab, ustekinumab, and placebo phase 3 comparator arms. Methods• Patients were included from four phase 3 trials -BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, and the BE BRIGHT open-label extension (interim cut: November 1, 2019)and four phase 2 studies -BE ABLE 1, BE ABLE 2, PS0016, and PS0018.Patients received bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W/Q8W; additional doses used in phase 2), adalimumab, ustekinumab, or placebo.• Short-term safety from the initial treatment periods (Weeks 0-16) of three of the phase 3 trials (BE SURE, BE VIVID, and BE READY) was evaluated for patients who received ≥1 dose of bimekizumab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, or placebo.• Longer-term safety was also evaluated for patients who received ≥1 dose of bimekizumab in BE SURE, BE VIVID, BE READY, BE BRIGHT, and the four phase 2 trials.• We report treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs; n [%]) for the initial treatment period for patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W, adalimumab, ustekinumab, and placebo, as well as longer-term TEAEs for patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W and all other doses of bimekizumab.-Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) are the incidence of new cases per 100 patient-years (PY) in patients receiving bimekizumab 320 mg Q4W (short-term) and all patients receiving any dose of bimekizumab (longer-term).-TEAEs were coded using MedDRA v19.0. Results Patient Population• Over 16 weeks, 989 patients with psoriasis received ≥1 bimekizumab dose, 159 patients received adalimumab, 163 patients received ustekinumab, and 169 patients received placebo.• Patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics are reported in Table 1. Short-Term Safety Outcomes• 593 (60.0%) bimekizumab-treated patients experienced ≥1 TEAE, versus 96 (60.4%) adalimumab-treated patients, 83 (50.9%) ustekinumab-treated patients, and 74 (43.8%) placebo-treated patients (Table 2).• Serious TEAEs occurred in <4% of patients in each treatment group, ranging from 1.5% for bimekizumab to 3.1% for ustekinumab.• Discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred in <5% of patients in each group, ranging from 1.7% for bimekizumab to 4.1% for placebo (Table 2).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".