Commentary: Aortic annuloplasty: One size does not fit all
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Central MessageA variety of annuloplasty techniques exist that may be used to correct aortic annular dilatation and support aortic valve and root reconstruction.See Article page 98. A variety of annuloplasty techniques exist that may be used to correct aortic annular dilatation and support aortic valve and root reconstruction. See Article page 98. Every component of the aortic root must be evaluated and restored to structural and functional competence for a durable repair. Failure to address the functional aortic annulus during aortic valve repair or root reconstruction has led to early failures, and several techniques have been developed to correct and prevent annular dilatation. Available data are marred by small numbers, alterations in technique over time, retrospective and incomplete data, and a lack of a comparator group. Failure to address other components of root morphology, particularly residual cusp prolapse or inadequate coaptation height, also lead to early failure, making it difficult to isolate the effect of annuloplasty on repair durability. The accompanying review paper by Professor Scha¨fers' group nicely summarizes the concepts behind aortic valve annuloplasty.1Federspiel J. Ehrlich T. Abeln K. Schafers H.-J. Aortic annuloplasty: subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 7: 98-102Scopus (6) Google Scholar The techniques include (1) subcommissural annular plication; (2) suture annuloplasty; (3) internal rings; (4) external rings or bands; and (5) reimplantation of the aortic valve. Of note, the first 3 options do not require deep circumferential dissection externally down to the basal ring. Subcommissural annuloplasty alone is not effective in treating gross annular dilatation2Aicher D. Kunihara T. Abou Issa O. Brittner B. Graber S. Schafers H.J. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve.Circulation. 2011; 123: 178-185Crossref PubMed Scopus (256) Google Scholar,3de Kerchove L. Mastrobuoni S. Boodhwani M. Astarci P. Rubay J. Poncelet A. et al.The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 49 (discussion 437-8): 428-437Crossref PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar and has been largely abandoned but may be useful in limited instances such as treating a commissural leak. Suture annuloplasty has been reported to improve valve competence in remodeling or isolated valve repair in centers of expertise4Aicher D. Schneider U. Schmied W. Kunihara T. Tochii M. Schafers H.J. Early results with annular support in reconstruction of the bicuspid aortic valve.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 145: S30-S34Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar; however, reproducibility and durability are unclear. It may be useful when external dissection is challenging, such as redo operations or bicuspid valves with a large distance between the basal ring and the ventriculoaortic junction. An internal rigid ring has been proposed as easier to implant; however, only early outcomes on a limited number of patients have been reported.5Rankin J.S. Mazzitelli D. Fischlein T. Choi Y.H. Pirk J. Pfeiffer S. et al.Geometric ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair during aortic aneurysm surgery: two-year clinical trial results.Innovations (Phila). 2018; 13: 248-253Crossref PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar We are concerned that forcing a massively dilated annulus down to a rigid ring without external support may lead to dehiscence of the ring. Furthermore, interaction of the valve cusps with the internal ring may damage the cusps. Finally, while most regurgitant bicuspid valves are Sievers I, the internal ring is preshaped at 180°. The reimplantation technique uses a series of pledgeted sutures internally and the base of the graft externally as the supporting annuloplasty. It has been considered to provide the best annular stabilization and provides excellent late results into the third decade.6David T.E. David C.M. Ouzounian M. Feindel C.M. Lafreniere-Roula M. A progress report on reimplantation of the aortic valve.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. September 4, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 7Mastrobuoni S. de Kerchove L. Navarra E. Watremez C. Vancraeynest D. Rubay J. et al.Long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 158: 14-23Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar, 8Nawaytou O. Mastrobuoni S. de Kerchove L. Baert J. Boodhwani M. El Khoury G. Deep circumferential annuloplasty as an adjunct to repair regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves with a dilated annulus.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156: 590-597Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar, 9Valdis M. Thain A. Jones P.M. Chan I. Chu M.W.A. Multimodal imaging of aortic annulus and root geometry after valve sparing root reconstruction.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 8: 362-371Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Concerns raised about failure of root remodeling in patients with annuloaortic ectasia may be obviated by the addition of an external annuloplasty with a circumferential ring or Dacron band.10Lansac E. Di Centa I. Sleilaty G. Lejeune S. Khelil N. Berrebi A. et al.Long-term results of external aortic ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 50: 350-360Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar,11Lenoir M. Maesen B. Stevens L.M. Cartier R. Demers P. Poirier N. et al.Reimplantation versus remodelling with ring annuloplasty: comparison of mid-term outcomes after valve-sparing aortic root replacement.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018; 54: 48-54Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar In summary, several annuloplasty techniques exist to correct annular dilatation and improve the surface of coaptation of the aortic valve, and these should be tailored to each individual. We suggest that the reimplantation technique should be the standard against which other techniques are compared. Systematic reporting of late results on patients followed prospectively with imaging is crucial to accurately determine the role of these techniques in our armamentarium. Stabilization of the aortic annulus is critical but is only one ingredient in a complex recipe leading to durable late results in patients undergoing reconstructive aortic valve surgery. Aortic annuloplasty: Subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal ringsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 7PreviewAortic valve repair and valve-preserving root replacement have evolved into increasingly practiced procedures. With increasing experience, the need for an annuloplasty has become more evident, at least for pathologies that involve annular dilatation. To understand the effect of an aortic annuloplasty, it is necessary to know the details of aortic valve and root anatomy. Geometrically, the functional annulus is best defined as the virtual basal ring, ie, plane of the cusp nadirs. The sinotubular diameter also influences the aortic valve form, at least in tricuspid valves. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».