Commentary: Aortic annuloplasty: One size does not fit all
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Central MessageA variety of annuloplasty techniques exist that may be used to correct aortic annular dilatation and support aortic valve and root reconstruction.See Article page 98. A variety of annuloplasty techniques exist that may be used to correct aortic annular dilatation and support aortic valve and root reconstruction. See Article page 98. Every component of the aortic root must be evaluated and restored to structural and functional competence for a durable repair. Failure to address the functional aortic annulus during aortic valve repair or root reconstruction has led to early failures, and several techniques have been developed to correct and prevent annular dilatation. Available data are marred by small numbers, alterations in technique over time, retrospective and incomplete data, and a lack of a comparator group. Failure to address other components of root morphology, particularly residual cusp prolapse or inadequate coaptation height, also lead to early failure, making it difficult to isolate the effect of annuloplasty on repair durability. The accompanying review paper by Professor Scha¨fers' group nicely summarizes the concepts behind aortic valve annuloplasty.1Federspiel J. Ehrlich T. Abeln K. Schafers H.-J. Aortic annuloplasty: subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 7: 98-102Scopus (6) Google Scholar The techniques include (1) subcommissural annular plication; (2) suture annuloplasty; (3) internal rings; (4) external rings or bands; and (5) reimplantation of the aortic valve. Of note, the first 3 options do not require deep circumferential dissection externally down to the basal ring. Subcommissural annuloplasty alone is not effective in treating gross annular dilatation2Aicher D. Kunihara T. Abou Issa O. Brittner B. Graber S. Schafers H.J. Valve configuration determines long-term results after repair of the bicuspid aortic valve.Circulation. 2011; 123: 178-185Crossref PubMed Scopus (256) Google Scholar,3de Kerchove L. Mastrobuoni S. Boodhwani M. Astarci P. Rubay J. Poncelet A. et al.The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 49 (discussion 437-8): 428-437Crossref PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar and has been largely abandoned but may be useful in limited instances such as treating a commissural leak. Suture annuloplasty has been reported to improve valve competence in remodeling or isolated valve repair in centers of expertise4Aicher D. Schneider U. Schmied W. Kunihara T. Tochii M. Schafers H.J. Early results with annular support in reconstruction of the bicuspid aortic valve.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 145: S30-S34Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (99) Google Scholar; however, reproducibility and durability are unclear. It may be useful when external dissection is challenging, such as redo operations or bicuspid valves with a large distance between the basal ring and the ventriculoaortic junction. An internal rigid ring has been proposed as easier to implant; however, only early outcomes on a limited number of patients have been reported.5Rankin J.S. Mazzitelli D. Fischlein T. Choi Y.H. Pirk J. Pfeiffer S. et al.Geometric ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair during aortic aneurysm surgery: two-year clinical trial results.Innovations (Phila). 2018; 13: 248-253Crossref PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar We are concerned that forcing a massively dilated annulus down to a rigid ring without external support may lead to dehiscence of the ring. Furthermore, interaction of the valve cusps with the internal ring may damage the cusps. Finally, while most regurgitant bicuspid valves are Sievers I, the internal ring is preshaped at 180°. The reimplantation technique uses a series of pledgeted sutures internally and the base of the graft externally as the supporting annuloplasty. It has been considered to provide the best annular stabilization and provides excellent late results into the third decade.6David T.E. David C.M. Ouzounian M. Feindel C.M. Lafreniere-Roula M. A progress report on reimplantation of the aortic valve.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. September 4, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 7Mastrobuoni S. de Kerchove L. Navarra E. Watremez C. Vancraeynest D. Rubay J. et al.Long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 158: 14-23Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar, 8Nawaytou O. Mastrobuoni S. de Kerchove L. Baert J. Boodhwani M. El Khoury G. Deep circumferential annuloplasty as an adjunct to repair regurgitant bicuspid aortic valves with a dilated annulus.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 156: 590-597Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (21) Google Scholar, 9Valdis M. Thain A. Jones P.M. Chan I. Chu M.W.A. Multimodal imaging of aortic annulus and root geometry after valve sparing root reconstruction.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 8: 362-371Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar Concerns raised about failure of root remodeling in patients with annuloaortic ectasia may be obviated by the addition of an external annuloplasty with a circumferential ring or Dacron band.10Lansac E. Di Centa I. Sleilaty G. Lejeune S. Khelil N. Berrebi A. et al.Long-term results of external aortic ring annuloplasty for aortic valve repair.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 50: 350-360Crossref PubMed Scopus (89) Google Scholar,11Lenoir M. Maesen B. Stevens L.M. Cartier R. Demers P. Poirier N. et al.Reimplantation versus remodelling with ring annuloplasty: comparison of mid-term outcomes after valve-sparing aortic root replacement.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018; 54: 48-54Crossref PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar In summary, several annuloplasty techniques exist to correct annular dilatation and improve the surface of coaptation of the aortic valve, and these should be tailored to each individual. We suggest that the reimplantation technique should be the standard against which other techniques are compared. Systematic reporting of late results on patients followed prospectively with imaging is crucial to accurately determine the role of these techniques in our armamentarium. Stabilization of the aortic annulus is critical but is only one ingredient in a complex recipe leading to durable late results in patients undergoing reconstructive aortic valve surgery. Aortic annuloplasty: Subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal ringsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 7PreviewAortic valve repair and valve-preserving root replacement have evolved into increasingly practiced procedures. With increasing experience, the need for an annuloplasty has become more evident, at least for pathologies that involve annular dilatation. To understand the effect of an aortic annuloplasty, it is necessary to know the details of aortic valve and root anatomy. Geometrically, the functional annulus is best defined as the virtual basal ring, ie, plane of the cusp nadirs. The sinotubular diameter also influences the aortic valve form, at least in tricuspid valves. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".