MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3126279717 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.01.037

Commentary: Suture annuloplasty for isolated aortic valve repair: The Holy Grail is yet to be found

2021· editorial· en· W3126279717 sur OpenAlexaff
François Dagenais

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversité Laval
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAortic valve repairMedicineRegurgitation (circulation)Aortic rootAortic valveFibrous jointAortic Valve InsufficiencySurgeryCardiologyAorta

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageAlthough significant milestones have been achieved in aortic valve reconstruction, the ideal annuloplasty technique in isolated aortic valve repair remains to be defined.See Article page 98. Although significant milestones have been achieved in aortic valve reconstruction, the ideal annuloplasty technique in isolated aortic valve repair remains to be defined. See Article page 98. In their article in this issue of the Journal, Federspiel and colleagues1Federspiel J. Ehrlich T. Abeln K. Schäfers H.J. Aortic annuloplasty: subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 7: 98-102Scopus (6) Google Scholar review current techniques for suture annuloplasty during isolated aortic valve repair. Since the initial descriptions of the reimplantation/remodeling techniques by David and Yacoub, significant milestones have been achieved in the field of aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation. Although initially viewed as more “art” than “science,” significant contributions have led to a better understanding of the concepts of aortic valve repair. Foremost, as elegantly illustrated in the present report, thorough knowledge of the normal anatomy and physiology linked to aortic valve competency is essential. Efforts at standardizing procedures according to different root anatomies have led to a more comprehensive approach to the procedures, and hence better reproducibility.2Boodhwani M. de Kerchove L. Glineur D. Poncelet A. Rubay J. Astarci P. et al.Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 137: 286-294Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (237) Google Scholar Finally, early echocardiographic findings, such as residual aortic regurgitation and effective leaflet height, have been identified as strong predictors of procedural outcome. Annular dilatation often accompanies aortic regurgitation, especially in the presence of root dilatation. Although the need for concomitant annuloplasty during root remodeling procedures is a matter of debate, the general consensus is that annuloplasty is required in cases of an annulus size >25 to 27 mm. A reimplantation technique has been shown to be effective for annular reduction and stabilization in the presence of root and annular dilatation. The ideal annuloplasty technique in “isolated aortic valve repair” (aortic root <40-45 mm) not requiring root replacement is unclear and is the focus of the present review. In an isolated aortic valve repair setting, the ideal annuloplasty technique should be effective in downsizing and stabilizing the annulus, easy to perform and reproducible, adapt to variability in annulus configurations, and able to restore/preserve root geometry. Furthermore, long-term durability with minimal complications, such as cusp mobility interference, conduction system anomalies, dehiscence, and biocompatibility, should be confirmed. Subcommissural sutures do not encompass the entire annulus and should not be considered a true annuloplasty. External rings have shown encouraging results with concomitant remodeling procedures. On the other hand, a variety of techniques using external, internal, or a combination of external and internal rings have been suggested for isolated aortic valve repair. Although the reported outcomes are acceptable, series remain small and limited to selected patients and few centers. Concerns remain about when to perform these procedures, as well as their reproducibility and adaptability to various root anatomies. The authors report the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene annuloplasty, a material shown to be durable in a mitral valve repair setting. The technique seems promising, because it can be tailored to the patient's anatomy, although a learning curve is reported to avoid impingement on surrounding structures. Thus, owing mainly to a lack of standardization and comparison among techniques, the authors conclude that with the current state of knowledge, no one technique can be recommended over another. Great progress in the field of aortic valve repair has been made over the past 2 decades. In the presence of root dilatation, root remodeling/reimplantation procedures have evolved to be durable and reproducible techniques. The much less common isolated aortic valve repair procedures lack standardization. Further studies are needed to elucidate when and how to add an annuloplasty in conjunction with cusp repair in a nondilated root setting. The authors are to be congratulated for their ongoing leadership and innovation in this complex field of aortic surgery. Aortic annuloplasty: Subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal ringsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 7PreviewAortic valve repair and valve-preserving root replacement have evolved into increasingly practiced procedures. With increasing experience, the need for an annuloplasty has become more evident, at least for pathologies that involve annular dilatation. To understand the effect of an aortic annuloplasty, it is necessary to know the details of aortic valve and root anatomy. Geometrically, the functional annulus is best defined as the virtual basal ring, ie, plane of the cusp nadirs. The sinotubular diameter also influences the aortic valve form, at least in tricuspid valves. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,005
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,355
Écart entre enseignants0,343 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJTCVS TechniquesMême sujetCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207