MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126279717 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.01.037

Commentary: Suture annuloplasty for isolated aortic valve repair: The Holy Grail is yet to be found

2021· editorial· en· W3126279717 on OpenAlexaff
François Dagenais

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAortic valve repairMedicineRegurgitation (circulation)Aortic rootAortic valveFibrous jointAortic Valve InsufficiencySurgeryCardiologyAorta

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central MessageAlthough significant milestones have been achieved in aortic valve reconstruction, the ideal annuloplasty technique in isolated aortic valve repair remains to be defined.See Article page 98. Although significant milestones have been achieved in aortic valve reconstruction, the ideal annuloplasty technique in isolated aortic valve repair remains to be defined. See Article page 98. In their article in this issue of the Journal, Federspiel and colleagues1Federspiel J. Ehrlich T. Abeln K. Schäfers H.J. Aortic annuloplasty: subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 7: 98-102Scopus (6) Google Scholar review current techniques for suture annuloplasty during isolated aortic valve repair. Since the initial descriptions of the reimplantation/remodeling techniques by David and Yacoub, significant milestones have been achieved in the field of aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation. Although initially viewed as more “art” than “science,” significant contributions have led to a better understanding of the concepts of aortic valve repair. Foremost, as elegantly illustrated in the present report, thorough knowledge of the normal anatomy and physiology linked to aortic valve competency is essential. Efforts at standardizing procedures according to different root anatomies have led to a more comprehensive approach to the procedures, and hence better reproducibility.2Boodhwani M. de Kerchove L. Glineur D. Poncelet A. Rubay J. Astarci P. et al.Repair-oriented classification of aortic insufficiency: impact on surgical techniques and clinical outcomes.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 137: 286-294Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (237) Google Scholar Finally, early echocardiographic findings, such as residual aortic regurgitation and effective leaflet height, have been identified as strong predictors of procedural outcome. Annular dilatation often accompanies aortic regurgitation, especially in the presence of root dilatation. Although the need for concomitant annuloplasty during root remodeling procedures is a matter of debate, the general consensus is that annuloplasty is required in cases of an annulus size >25 to 27 mm. A reimplantation technique has been shown to be effective for annular reduction and stabilization in the presence of root and annular dilatation. The ideal annuloplasty technique in “isolated aortic valve repair” (aortic root <40-45 mm) not requiring root replacement is unclear and is the focus of the present review. In an isolated aortic valve repair setting, the ideal annuloplasty technique should be effective in downsizing and stabilizing the annulus, easy to perform and reproducible, adapt to variability in annulus configurations, and able to restore/preserve root geometry. Furthermore, long-term durability with minimal complications, such as cusp mobility interference, conduction system anomalies, dehiscence, and biocompatibility, should be confirmed. Subcommissural sutures do not encompass the entire annulus and should not be considered a true annuloplasty. External rings have shown encouraging results with concomitant remodeling procedures. On the other hand, a variety of techniques using external, internal, or a combination of external and internal rings have been suggested for isolated aortic valve repair. Although the reported outcomes are acceptable, series remain small and limited to selected patients and few centers. Concerns remain about when to perform these procedures, as well as their reproducibility and adaptability to various root anatomies. The authors report the use of a polytetrafluoroethylene annuloplasty, a material shown to be durable in a mitral valve repair setting. The technique seems promising, because it can be tailored to the patient's anatomy, although a learning curve is reported to avoid impingement on surrounding structures. Thus, owing mainly to a lack of standardization and comparison among techniques, the authors conclude that with the current state of knowledge, no one technique can be recommended over another. Great progress in the field of aortic valve repair has been made over the past 2 decades. In the presence of root dilatation, root remodeling/reimplantation procedures have evolved to be durable and reproducible techniques. The much less common isolated aortic valve repair procedures lack standardization. Further studies are needed to elucidate when and how to add an annuloplasty in conjunction with cusp repair in a nondilated root setting. The authors are to be congratulated for their ongoing leadership and innovation in this complex field of aortic surgery. Aortic annuloplasty: Subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal ringsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 7PreviewAortic valve repair and valve-preserving root replacement have evolved into increasingly practiced procedures. With increasing experience, the need for an annuloplasty has become more evident, at least for pathologies that involve annular dilatation. To understand the effect of an aortic annuloplasty, it is necessary to know the details of aortic valve and root anatomy. Geometrically, the functional annulus is best defined as the virtual basal ring, ie, plane of the cusp nadirs. The sinotubular diameter also influences the aortic valve form, at least in tricuspid valves. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207