MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3134375046 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.03.001

Commentary: Never let semantics get in the way of a good idea

2021· editorial· en· W3134375046 sur OpenAlexaff
Ming Hao Guo, Fraser D. Rubens

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationMedicineExtracorporeal circulationIntensive care medicineCardiologySurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageThe addition of cannulas for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) should be called “extended” ECMO and should be in the armamentarium of heart failure surgeons.See Article page 77. The addition of cannulas for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) should be called “extended” ECMO and should be in the armamentarium of heart failure surgeons. See Article page 77. The Latin “hybrida,” refers to “offspring of a tamed sow and a wild boar.” In biology, it is commonly used to refer to animals and plants of heterogenous lineage. Its application is traditionally the same in technology. A hybrid car combines 2 different energy sources for propulsion. In cardiovascular medicine, hybrid revascularization represents the combination of 2 different strategies—percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting—to restore coronary circulation. Therefore, in its modern use, a hybrid refers to something that combines 2 distinctly different technologies with different mechanisms to achieve the same clinical outcome. In this issue of JTCVS Techniques, Shah and colleagues2Shah A. Sagar D. Goerlich C.E. Kaczorowski D.J. Hybrid and parallel extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 8: 77-85Scopus (3) Google Scholar provide a comprehensive summary of various configurations of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuits that can be used when a traditional circuit strategy does not adequately meet the patient's physiological demands. Importantly, the authors focus on strategies that augment ECMO with additional ECMO cannulas depending on the physiological need rather than with other short-term mechanical circulatory adjuncts. Over the years, numerous devices for short-term mechanical circulatory support, including the intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, and TandemHeart, have been invented, studied, and put into clinical use. These devices are inherently different than ECMO, but all serve to augment cardiac output. When used as an adjunct to ECMO for left ventricular venting, these “hybrid” short-term mechanical circulatory support models have been shown to improve survival in patients with cardiogenic shock.3Russo J.J. Aleksova N. Pitcher I. Couture E. Parlow S. Faraz M. et al.Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 654-662Crossref PubMed Scopus (132) Google Scholar These are truly hybrid technologies, as their applied mechanisms are completely different. On the other hand, when additional ECMO configurations are added to existing circuits, often a different part of the cardiopulmonary physiological demand is augmented using the same technology as the original circuit. Therefore, venous-venoarterial, venovenous-arterial, or parallel ECMO circuits perhaps should be more appropriated called “extended” ECMO, as they represent the use of the same ECMO equipment and strategy to adequately meet physiological demands. As the authors describe, ECMO can be “extended” by the addition of cannulas to improve drainage, facilitate oxygenation, or increase cardiac output. Both extended ECMO and hybrid strategies with short-term mechanical circulatory support are important tools in our armamentarium for critically ill patients. Understanding both strategies will allow the clinician to tailor therapy to the patient's physiological needs and minimize complications. Shah and colleagues are to be commended for their effort in detailing the approaches and considerations for extended ECMO as a potential option in the management of these critically ill patients. Hybrid and parallel extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuitsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 8PreviewAssociate Editor Note—Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been around since the 1950s and remains a tool for the management of patients with refractory respiratory or circulatory failure. The authors of this Invited Expert Opinion address modifications to traditional circuitry when peripheral cannulation does not appear sufficient and augmentation of venous drainage or ECMO flow is necessary. Although conversion to central cannulation is one option, expansion of the existing circuit to incorporate either a hybrid approach (eg, transitioning from veno-venous ECMO to veno-arteriovenous ECMO in the setting of refractory hypoxia or declining cardiac function) is another option. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,098
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJTCVS TechniquesMême sujetMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesTravaux en français237 207