MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3134375046 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.03.001

Commentary: Never let semantics get in the way of a good idea

2021· editorial· en· W3134375046 on OpenAlexaff
Ming Hao Guo, Fraser D. Rubens

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationMedicineExtracorporeal circulationIntensive care medicineCardiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central MessageThe addition of cannulas for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) should be called “extended” ECMO and should be in the armamentarium of heart failure surgeons.See Article page 77. The addition of cannulas for patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) should be called “extended” ECMO and should be in the armamentarium of heart failure surgeons. See Article page 77. The Latin “hybrida,” refers to “offspring of a tamed sow and a wild boar.” In biology, it is commonly used to refer to animals and plants of heterogenous lineage. Its application is traditionally the same in technology. A hybrid car combines 2 different energy sources for propulsion. In cardiovascular medicine, hybrid revascularization represents the combination of 2 different strategies—percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting—to restore coronary circulation. Therefore, in its modern use, a hybrid refers to something that combines 2 distinctly different technologies with different mechanisms to achieve the same clinical outcome. In this issue of JTCVS Techniques, Shah and colleagues2Shah A. Sagar D. Goerlich C.E. Kaczorowski D.J. Hybrid and parallel extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Tech. 2021; 8: 77-85Scopus (3) Google Scholar provide a comprehensive summary of various configurations of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuits that can be used when a traditional circuit strategy does not adequately meet the patient's physiological demands. Importantly, the authors focus on strategies that augment ECMO with additional ECMO cannulas depending on the physiological need rather than with other short-term mechanical circulatory adjuncts. Over the years, numerous devices for short-term mechanical circulatory support, including the intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella, and TandemHeart, have been invented, studied, and put into clinical use. These devices are inherently different than ECMO, but all serve to augment cardiac output. When used as an adjunct to ECMO for left ventricular venting, these “hybrid” short-term mechanical circulatory support models have been shown to improve survival in patients with cardiogenic shock.3Russo J.J. Aleksova N. Pitcher I. Couture E. Parlow S. Faraz M. et al.Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with cardiogenic shock.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 654-662Crossref PubMed Scopus (132) Google Scholar These are truly hybrid technologies, as their applied mechanisms are completely different. On the other hand, when additional ECMO configurations are added to existing circuits, often a different part of the cardiopulmonary physiological demand is augmented using the same technology as the original circuit. Therefore, venous-venoarterial, venovenous-arterial, or parallel ECMO circuits perhaps should be more appropriated called “extended” ECMO, as they represent the use of the same ECMO equipment and strategy to adequately meet physiological demands. As the authors describe, ECMO can be “extended” by the addition of cannulas to improve drainage, facilitate oxygenation, or increase cardiac output. Both extended ECMO and hybrid strategies with short-term mechanical circulatory support are important tools in our armamentarium for critically ill patients. Understanding both strategies will allow the clinician to tailor therapy to the patient's physiological needs and minimize complications. Shah and colleagues are to be commended for their effort in detailing the approaches and considerations for extended ECMO as a potential option in the management of these critically ill patients. Hybrid and parallel extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuitsJTCVS TechniquesVol. 8PreviewAssociate Editor Note—Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been around since the 1950s and remains a tool for the management of patients with refractory respiratory or circulatory failure. The authors of this Invited Expert Opinion address modifications to traditional circuitry when peripheral cannulation does not appear sufficient and augmentation of venous drainage or ECMO flow is necessary. Although conversion to central cannulation is one option, expansion of the existing circuit to incorporate either a hybrid approach (eg, transitioning from veno-venous ECMO to veno-arteriovenous ECMO in the setting of refractory hypoxia or declining cardiac function) is another option. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesFrench-language works237,207