MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3136352499 · doi:10.21838/uhpc.9694

UHPFRC Application in the Isabey-Darnley Pedestrian Bridge

2019· article· en· W3136352499 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Philippe Charron, Clélia Desmettre, Étienne Cantin-Bellemare

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrecast concreteDeckEngineeringPedestrianTrussBridge (graph theory)Structural engineeringSpan (engineering)Truss bridgeDurabilitySlabCivil engineeringComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

1.Project overview The Isabey-Darnley pedestrian bridge is located in Montreal (Quebec, Canada) over Highway 520 close to the International Airport. This new structure replaces the former reinforced concrete pedestrian bridge that was built in 1967, which suffered of early concrete spalling and rebar corrosion after only 40 years of service. The bridge allows pedestrians to cross the 9 lanes of the highway safely. In this area, the average annual daily traffic of the highway is 30 000. The objectives of this project were to design an aesthetically pleasing footbridge that was durable and cost effective, while minimizing impact on highway traffic during construction. Construction of this 61 m long footbridge of 3 span supported by steel Pony-Warren truss was completed in December 2016. The deck slab is made of ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) precast elements. The development of UHPFRC precast deck slabs for bridges is part of a 10-year research project involving Polytechnique Montreal, the City of Montreal and other partners. 2.Design and specifications of the precast slabs and field-cast joints The design of the precast slabs and field-cast joints were made considering the loads of the CSA-S6-2013 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code for loads (dead, live, snow, ice, handling and exceptional loads). Detailed information on the mechanical constitutive laws, structural design equations, durability requirements and quality control methods were taken from the 2013 recommendations of the French Association of Civil Engineering for UHPFRC structures. The design values for UHPFRC tensile properties were obtained considering the variability of the UHPFRC mixture (characteristic law). Then a security factor (-25 %) and a global orientation factor (- 20 %), to take into account disparity in fiber orientation due to the casting method, were applied. Finite-element analysis with Atena 3D software were also performed to confirm the satisfactory structural behavior of the precast slabs and joints (deflection and crack opening in service, rebar yielding and failure mode at ultimate). The final design comprises 11 precast slabs of 75 mm thick from 2 to 6 m long linked by 125 mm wide UHPFRC field-cast joints (100 mm rebar splices for 10M) (Figure 1). The precast slab includes curbs which serve as a security cladding for pedestrians, favor water drainage and strengthen the 75 mm-thick slab. The critical load combination for the precast slabs occurred during the construction process (handling and installation), whereas the field-cast joints were the critical part at the serviceability and ultimate limit states. After connection on site, the continuous slabs required very low positive and negative bending reinforcements and crack control reinforcement. The mechanical and durability properties of UHPFRC led to reductions of 64 % and 91 % of concrete and rebar volumes, respectively, in the UHPFRC slab in comparison to a conventional reinforced concrete slab. Technical specifications for the UHPFRC slabs and joints aimed to maximize flexural and shear strength of thin slab, minimize rebar splicing in the joint, and guarantee exceptional durability (crack widths inferior to 0.1 mm in slabs and joints in service condition). Composition requirements were water-to-binder ratio inferior to 0.25, 8 % minimum content of silica fume inthe binder and 4 %-vol. of steel fibers. Mechanical properties specified were a minimum tensile strength of 10.5 MPa, a minimum compressive strength of 100 MPa and some specifications to ensure a hardening behavior in the tensile pre-peak phase. The UHPFRC tensile behavior was verified by four-points bending tests on 400 x 100 x 50 mm3 prisms with the application of the Swiss Standard SIA 2052 inverse analysis. Durability performance criteria for freeze-thaw resistance, scaling and chloride permeability were also specified and a 7-day water curing was required for the slabs and field-cast joints. The UHPFRC selected for the project was the King Material UP-F4 having nominal compressive strength of 120 MPa and ultimate tensile strength of 11.5 MPa. 3.Construction time and costs The installation of the steel structure took 12 hours. The installation of the precast slabs of the Isabey-Darnley pedestrian bridge was achieved in two phases of 8 hours, while three periods of 8 hours were required for the casting of the UHPFRC field-cast joints under winter conditions. As a comparison, the construction period required for the cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab of the Barr pedestrian bridge built 1 km away over the same highway was 19 days. The cost of the precast UHPFRC slabs of the Isabey-Darnley bridge was twice the one of the cast-in-place slab of the Barr bridge. The impact of the UHPFRC utilization on the global project cost was an increase of 5%. Considering the expected life cycle costs of the Isabey-Darnley bridge (less maintenance and repair activities, extended durability of the slab), the use of UHPFRC of this application is an economical choice. 4.Conclusions and perspectives The fabrication and installation of the UHPFRC slabs were carried out without problems and the result was very satisfactory. Following this successful project, the City of Montreal is interested in using UHPFRC in the future for new and existing bridges to obtain very durable structures.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,025
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,050

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete→Travaux en français237 207→