MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3136352499 · doi:10.21838/uhpc.9694

UHPFRC Application in the Isabey-Darnley Pedestrian Bridge

2019· article· en· W3136352499 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean‐Philippe Charron, Clélia Desmettre, Étienne Cantin-Bellemare

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteDeckEngineeringPedestrianTrussBridge (graph theory)Structural engineeringSpan (engineering)Truss bridgeDurabilitySlabCivil engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1.Project overview The Isabey-Darnley pedestrian bridge is located in Montreal (Quebec, Canada) over Highway 520 close to the International Airport. This new structure replaces the former reinforced concrete pedestrian bridge that was built in 1967, which suffered of early concrete spalling and rebar corrosion after only 40 years of service. The bridge allows pedestrians to cross the 9 lanes of the highway safely. In this area, the average annual daily traffic of the highway is 30 000. The objectives of this project were to design an aesthetically pleasing footbridge that was durable and cost effective, while minimizing impact on highway traffic during construction. Construction of this 61 m long footbridge of 3 span supported by steel Pony-Warren truss was completed in December 2016. The deck slab is made of ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) precast elements. The development of UHPFRC precast deck slabs for bridges is part of a 10-year research project involving Polytechnique Montreal, the City of Montreal and other partners. 2.Design and specifications of the precast slabs and field-cast joints The design of the precast slabs and field-cast joints were made considering the loads of the CSA-S6-2013 Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code for loads (dead, live, snow, ice, handling and exceptional loads). Detailed information on the mechanical constitutive laws, structural design equations, durability requirements and quality control methods were taken from the 2013 recommendations of the French Association of Civil Engineering for UHPFRC structures. The design values for UHPFRC tensile properties were obtained considering the variability of the UHPFRC mixture (characteristic law). Then a security factor (-25 %) and a global orientation factor (- 20 %), to take into account disparity in fiber orientation due to the casting method, were applied. Finite-element analysis with Atena 3D software were also performed to confirm the satisfactory structural behavior of the precast slabs and joints (deflection and crack opening in service, rebar yielding and failure mode at ultimate). The final design comprises 11 precast slabs of 75 mm thick from 2 to 6 m long linked by 125 mm wide UHPFRC field-cast joints (100 mm rebar splices for 10M) (Figure 1). The precast slab includes curbs which serve as a security cladding for pedestrians, favor water drainage and strengthen the 75 mm-thick slab. The critical load combination for the precast slabs occurred during the construction process (handling and installation), whereas the field-cast joints were the critical part at the serviceability and ultimate limit states. After connection on site, the continuous slabs required very low positive and negative bending reinforcements and crack control reinforcement. The mechanical and durability properties of UHPFRC led to reductions of 64 % and 91 % of concrete and rebar volumes, respectively, in the UHPFRC slab in comparison to a conventional reinforced concrete slab. Technical specifications for the UHPFRC slabs and joints aimed to maximize flexural and shear strength of thin slab, minimize rebar splicing in the joint, and guarantee exceptional durability (crack widths inferior to 0.1 mm in slabs and joints in service condition). Composition requirements were water-to-binder ratio inferior to 0.25, 8 % minimum content of silica fume inthe binder and 4 %-vol. of steel fibers. Mechanical properties specified were a minimum tensile strength of 10.5 MPa, a minimum compressive strength of 100 MPa and some specifications to ensure a hardening behavior in the tensile pre-peak phase. The UHPFRC tensile behavior was verified by four-points bending tests on 400 x 100 x 50 mm3 prisms with the application of the Swiss Standard SIA 2052 inverse analysis. Durability performance criteria for freeze-thaw resistance, scaling and chloride permeability were also specified and a 7-day water curing was required for the slabs and field-cast joints. The UHPFRC selected for the project was the King Material UP-F4 having nominal compressive strength of 120 MPa and ultimate tensile strength of 11.5 MPa. 3.Construction time and costs The installation of the steel structure took 12 hours. The installation of the precast slabs of the Isabey-Darnley pedestrian bridge was achieved in two phases of 8 hours, while three periods of 8 hours were required for the casting of the UHPFRC field-cast joints under winter conditions. As a comparison, the construction period required for the cast-in-place reinforced concrete slab of the Barr pedestrian bridge built 1 km away over the same highway was 19 days. The cost of the precast UHPFRC slabs of the Isabey-Darnley bridge was twice the one of the cast-in-place slab of the Barr bridge. The impact of the UHPFRC utilization on the global project cost was an increase of 5%. Considering the expected life cycle costs of the Isabey-Darnley bridge (less maintenance and repair activities, extended durability of the slab), the use of UHPFRC of this application is an economical choice. 4.Conclusions and perspectives The fabrication and installation of the UHPFRC slabs were carried out without problems and the result was very satisfactory. Following this successful project, the City of Montreal is interested in using UHPFRC in the future for new and existing bridges to obtain very durable structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete→French-language works237,207→