MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3136398281 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2017.0346

Beyond Women and Power: Looking Backward and Moving Forward ed. by Kathy M. Krause

2017· article· en· W3136398281 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erika E. Hess

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œFrench review · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedieval Literature and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésScholarshipPower (physics)White (mutation)SculpturePaintingHistoryArtArt historyVisual artsSociologyAestheticsLiteratureLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviews 281 remained essentially unchanged at the start of the twenty-first century. The numerous illustrations, including sketches, sculptures, and paintings depicting the white-tooth smile and diverse dental instruments, contribute to the rich interdisciplinary nature of the book while the extensive notes at the end provide ample material to further investigate more complex questions in the field. However, it is the colorful and amusing way Jones describes the exciting shifts and specificities of the smile which makes for such a captivating read.The conclusion looks towards the nineteenth century and succinctly summarizes larger trends, tooth maintenance and the open-mouth smile as a female attribute in particular, with the Postscript emphasizing the dominant role of the United States in commercialized dentistry from the nineteenth century onward. The Smile Revolution provides food for thought for those with a keen interest in the French Revolution beyond traditional historical analyses as well as for those who are curious about the evolution of scientific dentistry. The book will certainly bring a smile, if not a cheeky grin, to any reader’s lips and help to rethink the ubiquitous presence of this cultural product in modern life. University of Toronto Catherine Gaughan Krause, Kathy M., ed. Beyond Women and Power: Looking Backward and Moving Forward. Medieval Feminist Forum 51.2 (2015). Pp. 147. $20. As recently as the mid-1980s, there existed few serious works of medieval feminist historical and literary scholarship. Moreover, not many studies have been available to students and scholars interested in exploring the roles and responsibilities of medieval and early modern queens and noblewomen, women’s access to power, or the structure of the aristocratic family. The twelve articles in this special issue of Medieval Feminist Forum trace the considerable growth of interest in medieval feminist studies over the past thirty years and bring together a diverse variety of recent works on women and power, in the hopes of increasing readership and inspiring new questions and studies. Although not a study of specifically French history or literary works, all of the articles in the issue include analyses of French women or works (including Anglo-Norman women, as well as women rulers from Navarre), and the majority focus primarily on France. The authors examine the biases and prejudices of the historiographic record as they undertake new directions in a variety of disciplines. The issue offers clear and accessible reviews of past work on women and power, focusing on the increased interest in Eleanor of Aquitaine and Anglo-Norman queenship, on aristocratic families of the Chartrain, and on the life of Countess Ermengard of Brittany, all in order to challenge the established perspective that powerful medieval women were extraordinary or exceptional. In an attempt to examine old myths of female disempowerment, the authors also show an interest in the integration of literary and historical scholarship in the study of Old French literary representations of female lords. While some of the authors in the issue encourage scholars to challenge accepted boundaries and divisions, others work across traditional boundaries through specific studies of ruling women of the Holy Roman Empire (Penelope Nash), and of Jerusalem and Navarre (Elena Woodacre). Tracy Adams’s work on Isabeau de Bavière documents the reiterative nature of much secondary literature and argues for a return to primary sources; Kathleen Wellman’s study of two royal mothers: Catherine de Medici and Louise Savoy, underscores that for women, just as for men, there are many different routes to power. Christine Adams’s analysis of commentaries on two mistresses: Madame de Montespan and Madame Tallien, stresses the importance of re-examining the accepted historiography and warns against repeating outdated interpretations. Marie Kelleher and Theresa Earenfight, broaden the critical lens by re-thinking the fundamental definitions of women and power.Constance Berman’s concluding article on thirteenthcentury Cistercian nunneries draws together key concepts of this volume by bringing to light long-neglected documents to demonstrate the strong evidence for powerful feudal ‘Lady/Lords’ of northern France. The issue will be of significant interest to students and scholars of women and power in the fields of French or European history, literature, and gender studies. In its persuasive demonstration of the dangers of relying...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,724
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,217 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œFrench reviewMême sujetMedieval Literature and HistoryTravaux en français237 207