MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3136398281 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2017.0346

Beyond Women and Power: Looking Backward and Moving Forward ed. by Kathy M. Krause

2017· article· en· W3136398281 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erika E. Hess

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipPower (physics)White (mutation)SculpturePaintingHistoryArtArt historyVisual artsSociologyAestheticsLiteratureLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviews 281 remained essentially unchanged at the start of the twenty-first century. The numerous illustrations, including sketches, sculptures, and paintings depicting the white-tooth smile and diverse dental instruments, contribute to the rich interdisciplinary nature of the book while the extensive notes at the end provide ample material to further investigate more complex questions in the field. However, it is the colorful and amusing way Jones describes the exciting shifts and specificities of the smile which makes for such a captivating read.The conclusion looks towards the nineteenth century and succinctly summarizes larger trends, tooth maintenance and the open-mouth smile as a female attribute in particular, with the Postscript emphasizing the dominant role of the United States in commercialized dentistry from the nineteenth century onward. The Smile Revolution provides food for thought for those with a keen interest in the French Revolution beyond traditional historical analyses as well as for those who are curious about the evolution of scientific dentistry. The book will certainly bring a smile, if not a cheeky grin, to any reader’s lips and help to rethink the ubiquitous presence of this cultural product in modern life. University of Toronto Catherine Gaughan Krause, Kathy M., ed. Beyond Women and Power: Looking Backward and Moving Forward. Medieval Feminist Forum 51.2 (2015). Pp. 147. $20. As recently as the mid-1980s, there existed few serious works of medieval feminist historical and literary scholarship. Moreover, not many studies have been available to students and scholars interested in exploring the roles and responsibilities of medieval and early modern queens and noblewomen, women’s access to power, or the structure of the aristocratic family. The twelve articles in this special issue of Medieval Feminist Forum trace the considerable growth of interest in medieval feminist studies over the past thirty years and bring together a diverse variety of recent works on women and power, in the hopes of increasing readership and inspiring new questions and studies. Although not a study of specifically French history or literary works, all of the articles in the issue include analyses of French women or works (including Anglo-Norman women, as well as women rulers from Navarre), and the majority focus primarily on France. The authors examine the biases and prejudices of the historiographic record as they undertake new directions in a variety of disciplines. The issue offers clear and accessible reviews of past work on women and power, focusing on the increased interest in Eleanor of Aquitaine and Anglo-Norman queenship, on aristocratic families of the Chartrain, and on the life of Countess Ermengard of Brittany, all in order to challenge the established perspective that powerful medieval women were extraordinary or exceptional. In an attempt to examine old myths of female disempowerment, the authors also show an interest in the integration of literary and historical scholarship in the study of Old French literary representations of female lords. While some of the authors in the issue encourage scholars to challenge accepted boundaries and divisions, others work across traditional boundaries through specific studies of ruling women of the Holy Roman Empire (Penelope Nash), and of Jerusalem and Navarre (Elena Woodacre). Tracy Adams’s work on Isabeau de Bavière documents the reiterative nature of much secondary literature and argues for a return to primary sources; Kathleen Wellman’s study of two royal mothers: Catherine de Medici and Louise Savoy, underscores that for women, just as for men, there are many different routes to power. Christine Adams’s analysis of commentaries on two mistresses: Madame de Montespan and Madame Tallien, stresses the importance of re-examining the accepted historiography and warns against repeating outdated interpretations. Marie Kelleher and Theresa Earenfight, broaden the critical lens by re-thinking the fundamental definitions of women and power.Constance Berman’s concluding article on thirteenthcentury Cistercian nunneries draws together key concepts of this volume by bringing to light long-neglected documents to demonstrate the strong evidence for powerful feudal ‘Lady/Lords’ of northern France. The issue will be of significant interest to students and scholars of women and power in the fields of French or European history, literature, and gender studies. In its persuasive demonstration of the dangers of relying...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207