MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3154003176 · doi:10.1353/ail.2020.0019

"We Are Here Now": The Generative Refusal of Fictional Residential School Diaries

2020· article· en· W3154003176 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melanie Braith

Notice bibliographique

RevueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésResistance (ecology)IndigenousSociologyResidential schoolAlienationGender studiesCriminologyPsychologyLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

"We Are Here Now"The Generative Refusal of Fictional Residential School Diaries Melanie Braith (bio) A fictional residential school diary is a diary-structured novel purportedly written in secret by a residential school student who has escaped all school censorship. The Canadian residential school system, which existed from the 1880s to 1996, separated Indigenous children from their families, communities, and homelands and forbade them to speak their languages and engage in other cultural practices. It also inflicted physical, sexual, emotional, and spiritual violence on students. By attacking students' relationships with their families, communities, the land, and the other-than-human, the schools attacked what Glenn Coulthard terms the "grounded normativity" of Indigeneity (13). However, as scholars point out, new ways of resistance are often born and practiced in the most coercive institutions (Harlow 10), and though residential schools were coercive, totalizing institutions, or perhaps because of this, they nevertheless faced resistance by the Indigenous children they incarcerated. This article analyzes how the fictional residential school diary These Are My Words (2017) by Anishinaabe author Ruby Slipperjack employs the diary as a medium for restor(y)ing relationships—with self, kin, and the land—and thereby for enacting resistance. In order to demonstrate how residential school discourse had changed over time, the article furthermore briefly examines the extent to which resistance is addressed in Nlakapamux author Shirley Sterling's much earlier fictional residential school diary My Name is Seepeetza (1992). As will be demonstrated, Leanne Simpson's concept of "generative refusal" (As We Have 35) is a helpful framework for interpreting resistance in fictional residential school diaries because it crucially conceptualizes resistance as care for the kinship relationships constituting Indigeneity. Analyzing fictional residential school diaries through the lens of generative refusal [End Page 88] offers new ways for understanding how residential school literature and, more broadly, residential school testimony resist and rewrite colonial narratives. While residential school survivors have never been silent about their institutional experiences, over the last four decades, they have been telling their stories more frequently and in greater numbers to an also increasing public audience. They have publicly shared their stories in different forms—including as autobiographies, novels, plays, graphic novels, poetry, and film. This cross-format range of works constitutes the genre that Renate Eigenbrod calls residential school literature ("For the Child" 278). Survivors have also shared their stories in interviews with the Assembly of First Nations, the Aboriginal Healing Foundation, and the Legacy of Hope Foundation. Nearly 7,000 survivors testified and shared their stories with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established by the Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement in conjunction with a five-year mandate (and one-year extension) to gather statements and historical documents toward the construction of a residential school history. Diaries written by students at the times of their residential school incarceration have never been shared with the public and are not among the millions of collected documents at the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation. As the two fictional diaries analyzed here emphasize, writing a secret diary was both dangerous and often near impossible given schools' ubiquitous surveillance and censorship. This does not mean no residential school diaries exist, only that they have not been shared publicly. The only available diaries are fictionalized versions writers have based on their own residential school experiences and released as novels. I first read Sterling's and Slipperjack's fictional diaries when working as a research assistant at the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation in Winnipeg. As a PhD student specialized in residential school testimony, I was well familiar with residential school narratives, but given the unavailability of nonfictional residential school diaries, I was especially intrigued by the genre of fictional residential school diaries. Growing up in Germany where The Diary of Anne Frank was a common school text, I early on learned the responsibility of learning one's national history and of honoring that history by preventing its reoccurrence. As a non-Indigenous researcher in the field of Indigenous literatures [End Page 89] in Canada, I aspire to engage with Indigenous stories in a way that acknowledges the harms of colonialism and that helps decolonize the present. Through this article's...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,504
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,346
Écart entre enseignants0,322 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueStudies in American Indian LiteraturesMême sujetIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsTravaux en français237 207