MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3154003176 · doi:10.1353/ail.2020.0019

"We Are Here Now": The Generative Refusal of Fictional Residential School Diaries

2020· article· en· W3154003176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melanie Braith

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in American Indian Literatures · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance (ecology)IndigenousSociologyResidential schoolAlienationGender studiesCriminologyPsychologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"We Are Here Now"The Generative Refusal of Fictional Residential School Diaries Melanie Braith (bio) A fictional residential school diary is a diary-structured novel purportedly written in secret by a residential school student who has escaped all school censorship. The Canadian residential school system, which existed from the 1880s to 1996, separated Indigenous children from their families, communities, and homelands and forbade them to speak their languages and engage in other cultural practices. It also inflicted physical, sexual, emotional, and spiritual violence on students. By attacking students' relationships with their families, communities, the land, and the other-than-human, the schools attacked what Glenn Coulthard terms the "grounded normativity" of Indigeneity (13). However, as scholars point out, new ways of resistance are often born and practiced in the most coercive institutions (Harlow 10), and though residential schools were coercive, totalizing institutions, or perhaps because of this, they nevertheless faced resistance by the Indigenous children they incarcerated. This article analyzes how the fictional residential school diary These Are My Words (2017) by Anishinaabe author Ruby Slipperjack employs the diary as a medium for restor(y)ing relationships—with self, kin, and the land—and thereby for enacting resistance. In order to demonstrate how residential school discourse had changed over time, the article furthermore briefly examines the extent to which resistance is addressed in Nlakapamux author Shirley Sterling's much earlier fictional residential school diary My Name is Seepeetza (1992). As will be demonstrated, Leanne Simpson's concept of "generative refusal" (As We Have 35) is a helpful framework for interpreting resistance in fictional residential school diaries because it crucially conceptualizes resistance as care for the kinship relationships constituting Indigeneity. Analyzing fictional residential school diaries through the lens of generative refusal [End Page 88] offers new ways for understanding how residential school literature and, more broadly, residential school testimony resist and rewrite colonial narratives. While residential school survivors have never been silent about their institutional experiences, over the last four decades, they have been telling their stories more frequently and in greater numbers to an also increasing public audience. They have publicly shared their stories in different forms—including as autobiographies, novels, plays, graphic novels, poetry, and film. This cross-format range of works constitutes the genre that Renate Eigenbrod calls residential school literature ("For the Child" 278). Survivors have also shared their stories in interviews with the Assembly of First Nations, the Aboriginal Healing Foundation, and the Legacy of Hope Foundation. Nearly 7,000 survivors testified and shared their stories with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established by the Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement in conjunction with a five-year mandate (and one-year extension) to gather statements and historical documents toward the construction of a residential school history. Diaries written by students at the times of their residential school incarceration have never been shared with the public and are not among the millions of collected documents at the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation. As the two fictional diaries analyzed here emphasize, writing a secret diary was both dangerous and often near impossible given schools' ubiquitous surveillance and censorship. This does not mean no residential school diaries exist, only that they have not been shared publicly. The only available diaries are fictionalized versions writers have based on their own residential school experiences and released as novels. I first read Sterling's and Slipperjack's fictional diaries when working as a research assistant at the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation in Winnipeg. As a PhD student specialized in residential school testimony, I was well familiar with residential school narratives, but given the unavailability of nonfictional residential school diaries, I was especially intrigued by the genre of fictional residential school diaries. Growing up in Germany where The Diary of Anne Frank was a common school text, I early on learned the responsibility of learning one's national history and of honoring that history by preventing its reoccurrence. As a non-Indigenous researcher in the field of Indigenous literatures [End Page 89] in Canada, I aspire to engage with Indigenous stories in a way that acknowledges the harms of colonialism and that helps decolonize the present. Through this article's...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.021
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0210.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.038
Scholarly communication0.0120.013
Open science0.0030.014
Research integrity0.0030.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in American Indian LiteraturesSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207