Malcolm Kerr Muir, FRCS, FRCOphth, FRCP
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Malcolm Kerr Muir’s death after a short illness, on 10 November 2019 at the age of 72, aborted his vigorous post-retirement career, devoted to the enhancement of ophthalmic care in low-income countries. Malcolm was very modest: quiet about his achievements and self-effacing in his story-telling. However, a lack of self-advertisement should not deny him recognition for his considerable contribution to ophthalmology. He was gifted in many fields, and a perfectionist in all he did. He was an insightful physician and an outstanding ophthalmic surgeon. His medicine and ophthalmology were approached through intense observation and a precise understanding of physiology and pathology. He had a gift for recognising technologies that might enhance the practice of ophthalmology, and this has changed our discipline. His determination that the benefits of medicine should be available to those with poor resources and greatest need has benefited countless patients in developing countries. Malcolm was the third of four children, born into a warm, happy household during the coldest winter of the century. He remembered the thrill of skiing to school, when his father’s work took the family to Canada, and the companionship of walking with his father in the Lake District. He would later develop an encyclopaedic knowledge of its peaks and valleys, completing all the Wainwright walks. The notion that he could become a doctor was implanted when his mother was unwell; he decided to look after her, although the only ‘medicine’ at his disposal was tea and biscuits. At Rugby school, he threw himself into music (trumpet and piano) and all sports, and was selected for the school hockey and cricket teams. He told of his one appearance at Lord’s, during which he tripped over the boundary rope on his way both to and from the crease, scoring only 3 runs while there (he …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,065 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».