MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Malcolm Kerr Muir, FRCS, FRCOphth, FRCP

2021· article· en· W3160980216 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P Meyer, Evelyn Brealey, Roger Buckley, John Marshall, Martin P. Snead

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Ophthalmology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOphthalmologyGeneral surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Malcolm Kerr Muir’s death after a short illness, on 10 November 2019 at the age of 72, aborted his vigorous post-retirement career, devoted to the enhancement of ophthalmic care in low-income countries. Malcolm was very modest: quiet about his achievements and self-effacing in his story-telling. However, a lack of self-advertisement should not deny him recognition for his considerable contribution to ophthalmology. He was gifted in many fields, and a perfectionist in all he did. He was an insightful physician and an outstanding ophthalmic surgeon. His medicine and ophthalmology were approached through intense observation and a precise understanding of physiology and pathology. He had a gift for recognising technologies that might enhance the practice of ophthalmology, and this has changed our discipline. His determination that the benefits of medicine should be available to those with poor resources and greatest need has benefited countless patients in developing countries. Malcolm was the third of four children, born into a warm, happy household during the coldest winter of the century. He remembered the thrill of skiing to school, when his father’s work took the family to Canada, and the companionship of walking with his father in the Lake District. He would later develop an encyclopaedic knowledge of its peaks and valleys, completing all the Wainwright walks. The notion that he could become a doctor was implanted when his mother was unwell; he decided to look after her, although the only ‘medicine’ at his disposal was tea and biscuits. At Rugby school, he threw himself into music (trumpet and piano) and all sports, and was selected for the school hockey and cricket teams. He told of his one appearance at Lord’s, during which he tripped over the boundary rope on his way both to and from the crease, scoring only 3 runs while there (he …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.349
Threshold uncertainty score0.936

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of OphthalmologySame topicMedical History and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207