The Association Between Race and Adverse Postoperative Outcomes in Children With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The association between race and perioperative outcomes has been evaluated in adult cardiac surgical and in healthy pediatric patients but has not been evaluated in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) presenting for noncardiac procedures. This study compares the incidence of the primary outcome of 30-day mortality and adverse postoperative outcomes following noncardiac surgery between Black and White children with CHD, stratified by severity. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Comparison of outcomes between Black and White children was performed using the 2012-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database and after stratification for severity of CHD and propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 55,859 patients were included, and divided into 28,601 minor, 23,839 major, and 3419 severe CHD. Black and White children in each category were matched and compared. Following matching in the overall CHD cohort, there were significantly higher rates of the following adverse postoperative outcomes among Black patients as compared to White patients: 30-day mortality (1.84% vs 1.49%; odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.48; P = .014), composite secondary outcomes (19.90% vs 17.88%; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21; P < .001), cardiac arrest (1.42% vs 0.98%; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.19-1.79; P < .001), 30-day reoperation (7.59% vs 6.67%; OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002), and reintubation (3.9% vs 2.95%; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.19-1.52; P < .001). No significant statistical interaction between race and CHD severity was found. Following matching and within the minor CHD cohort, Black children had significantly higher rates of composite secondary outcome (17.44% vs 15.60%; OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002), cardiac arrest (1.02% vs 0.53%; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.37-2.76; P < .001), 30-day reoperation (7.19% vs 5.77%; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.43; P < .001), and thromboembolic complications (0.49% vs 0.23%; OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.29-3.63; P = .003) compared to White children. In the major CHD cohort, Black children had significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality (2.75% vs 2.05%; OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08-1.69; P = .008) and reintubation (4.82% vs 3.72%; OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11-1.56; P = .002). There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes in the severe CHD category for 30-day mortality (3.36% vs 3.3%; OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.60-1.73; P = .946), composite secondary outcome (22.65% vs 21.36%; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.86-1.36; P = .517) nor the components of the composite secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Race is associated with postoperative mortality and complications in children with minor and major CHD undergoing noncardiac surgery. No significant association was observed between race and postoperative outcomes in patients with severe CHD. This is consistent with previous findings wherein in patients with severe CHD, residual lesion burden and functional status is the leading predictor of outcomes following noncardiac surgery. Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the relationship between race and outcomes differs across the CHD severity categories. Future studies to understand the mechanisms leading to the racial difference, including institutional, clinical, and individual factors are needed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».