The Association Between Race and Adverse Postoperative Outcomes in Children With Congenital Heart Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The association between race and perioperative outcomes has been evaluated in adult cardiac surgical and in healthy pediatric patients but has not been evaluated in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) presenting for noncardiac procedures. This study compares the incidence of the primary outcome of 30-day mortality and adverse postoperative outcomes following noncardiac surgery between Black and White children with CHD, stratified by severity. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Comparison of outcomes between Black and White children was performed using the 2012-2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database and after stratification for severity of CHD and propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 55,859 patients were included, and divided into 28,601 minor, 23,839 major, and 3419 severe CHD. Black and White children in each category were matched and compared. Following matching in the overall CHD cohort, there were significantly higher rates of the following adverse postoperative outcomes among Black patients as compared to White patients: 30-day mortality (1.84% vs 1.49%; odds ratio [OR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.48; P = .014), composite secondary outcomes (19.90% vs 17.88%; OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21; P < .001), cardiac arrest (1.42% vs 0.98%; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.19-1.79; P < .001), 30-day reoperation (7.59% vs 6.67%; OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002), and reintubation (3.9% vs 2.95%; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.19-1.52; P < .001). No significant statistical interaction between race and CHD severity was found. Following matching and within the minor CHD cohort, Black children had significantly higher rates of composite secondary outcome (17.44% vs 15.60%; OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.05-1.25; P = .002), cardiac arrest (1.02% vs 0.53%; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.37-2.76; P < .001), 30-day reoperation (7.19% vs 5.77%; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.43; P < .001), and thromboembolic complications (0.49% vs 0.23%; OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.29-3.63; P = .003) compared to White children. In the major CHD cohort, Black children had significantly higher rates of 30-day mortality (2.75% vs 2.05%; OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08-1.69; P = .008) and reintubation (4.82% vs 3.72%; OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.11-1.56; P = .002). There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes in the severe CHD category for 30-day mortality (3.36% vs 3.3%; OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.60-1.73; P = .946), composite secondary outcome (22.65% vs 21.36%; OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.86-1.36; P = .517) nor the components of the composite secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Race is associated with postoperative mortality and complications in children with minor and major CHD undergoing noncardiac surgery. No significant association was observed between race and postoperative outcomes in patients with severe CHD. This is consistent with previous findings wherein in patients with severe CHD, residual lesion burden and functional status is the leading predictor of outcomes following noncardiac surgery. Nevertheless, there is no evidence that the relationship between race and outcomes differs across the CHD severity categories. Future studies to understand the mechanisms leading to the racial difference, including institutional, clinical, and individual factors are needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".