KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: A CASE STUDY IN THE BRAZILIAN INDUSTRY
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper discusses the rapid transformation of industries in southern Brazil, due to management methodologies and the phenomenon of economic globalization. The study investigates the Corporate University (CU), as a management tool embedded in organizational planning, in order to identify the degree of importance perceived by managers to adopt this practice. Management with tools, methods and processes consistent with the organizational level, creates conditions for market positioning and search anticipate societal changes or crises inserting useful knowledge for the right organizational level without wasted effort in data collection. Based on these arguments, the research seeks to present a review of the practices of knowledge management, especially the corporate university and organizational management. The knowledge as an organizational resource stood out over the past two decades, especially with the advent of the Knowledge-Based View (KBV), which show a mixture between the knowledge management and business efficiency. The structure of these processes, tools and / or methods consolidates incorporating these practices of knowledge management (KM), among others the practice of UC. This applicability is a decisive factor for the organization, because knowledge is a strategic tool that leads to the increase in benefits, for creating sustainable competitive advantages. Methodologically the study was descriptive in nature applied quantitative approach and data collection was done through online survey - Survey. The technique adopted was non-probabilistic sampling and for sample calculation, we applied the formula for infinite population. 3073 industries of southern Brazil and 659 employees in strategic, tactical and operational level were researched. The questionnaires were returned by respondents electronically. Among the responses, over half of the respondents 54.55% considered the UC practice important and 25.97% consider, according to the non-parametric statistical Kruskal-Wallis, very important no significant difference in the response of this practice of knowledge management among the strategic, tactical and operational groups. In this setting, it was concluded that the practice (UC) is pretty important for strategic development of industries in southern Brazil, as well as reveals the concern by industry in protecting the knowledge (technology watch) and ensure the right of marketing your products or process improvements.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,051 | 0,012 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle