MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: A CASE STUDY IN THE BRAZILIAN INDUSTRY

2015· dataset· en· W3164044948 on OpenAlex
Alisson Marcelo Laurindo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFigshare · 2015
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsFirst Nations University of CanadaUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKnowledge managementCompetitive advantageBusinessData collectionOrganizational learningPopulationStrategic managementSample (material)MarketingComputer scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the rapid transformation of industries in southern Brazil, due to management methodologies and the phenomenon of economic globalization. The study investigates the Corporate University (CU), as a management tool embedded in organizational planning, in order to identify the degree of importance perceived by managers to adopt this practice. Management with tools, methods and processes consistent with the organizational level, creates conditions for market positioning and search anticipate societal changes or crises inserting useful knowledge for the right organizational level without wasted effort in data collection. Based on these arguments, the research seeks to present a review of the practices of knowledge management, especially the corporate university and organizational management. The knowledge as an organizational resource stood out over the past two decades, especially with the advent of the Knowledge-Based View (KBV), which show a mixture between the knowledge management and business efficiency. The structure of these processes, tools and / or methods consolidates incorporating these practices of knowledge management (KM), among others the practice of UC. This applicability is a decisive factor for the organization, because knowledge is a strategic tool that leads to the increase in benefits, for creating sustainable competitive advantages. Methodologically the study was descriptive in nature applied quantitative approach and data collection was done through online survey - Survey. The technique adopted was non-probabilistic sampling and for sample calculation, we applied the formula for infinite population. 3073 industries of southern Brazil and 659 employees in strategic, tactical and operational level were researched. The questionnaires were returned by respondents electronically. Among the responses, over half of the respondents 54.55% considered the UC practice important and 25.97% consider, according to the non-parametric statistical Kruskal-Wallis, very important no significant difference in the response of this practice of knowledge management among the strategic, tactical and operational groups. In this setting, it was concluded that the practice (UC) is pretty important for strategic development of industries in southern Brazil, as well as reveals the concern by industry in protecting the knowledge (technology watch) and ensure the right of marketing your products or process improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.513
GPT teacher head0.509
Teacher spread0.004 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it