Receptor Endocytosis as a Mechanism of Biased Agonism at CXCR3
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
G Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of receptors in the human genome. They are expressed in virtually every cell type and are implicated in numerous physiological processes. GPCR signaling is highly specific due to biased agonism, in which different ligands, receptors, or cellular systems selectively activate different signaling pathways. The chemokine system, a subfamily of GPCRs primarily present on leukocytes, serves as an endogenous example of biased agonism due to the significant promiscuity between chemokine ligands and receptors. For example, the chemokine receptor CXCR3 and its ligands CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 have clearly demonstrated bias in vitro and in vivo. GPCRs are conventionally understood to signal exclusively from the plasma membrane. Therefore, the ligand‐induced internalization of receptors is thought to desensitize G Protein‐dependent signaling. However, recent research has shown that numerous GPCRs signal from intracellular membranes, including the endoplasmic reticulum, the golgi, and the endosome. This novel finding has led to the discovery that the subcellular location of a GPCR can affect its functional output. The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of receptor endocytosis to CXCR3's biased agonism. We hypothesize that CXCR3 signals from the early endosome, and as CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 promote different patterns of internalization, endocytic signaling is a mechanism for the functional selectivity of its endogenous ligands. We performed BRET and confocal microscopy on C‐terminal phosphodeficient mutants of CXCR3 to measure their internalization in response to stimulation with CXCL9, CXCL10, or CXCL11. While stimulation with CXCL9 did not induce significant internalization of WT CXCR3 or any CXCR3 mutants, stimulation with CXCL10 or CXCL11 promoted β‐arrestin mediated internalization of CXCR3 that was decreased in the phosphodeficient mutants. Internalization was almost completely eliminated at the CXCR3‐L344X truncation mutant. We also measured the phosphorylation of extracellular‐signal related kinase 1/2 (ERK 1/2) in response to stimulation with CXCL9, CXCL10, or CXCL11. These results showed that the CXCR3 mutants promoted more pERK 1/2 than WT CXCR3 when stimulated with CXCL10 or CXCL11. Notably, CXCR3‐L344X promoted the most pERK 1/2 out of all studied receptors. This negative correlation between receptor internalization and pERK1/2 could suggest that endocytosis has an inhibitory effect on ERK signaling. To further assess the contribution of endocytic signaling to CXCR3's signaling effects, we will inhibit receptor endocytosis through treatment with Barbadin, a selective pharmacological inhibitor of the β‐arrestin/AP2 complex required for endocytosis, or through overexpression of mutant dynamin, a protein responsible for scission of clathrin‐coated endocytic vesicles. We will evaluate how inhibiting endocytosis impacts CXCR3's ligand‐induced G Protein signal, ERK response, transcriptional reporter activation, and chemotaxis. We expect that inhibiting endocytosis will decrease the extent of bias between the three ligands, thus implicating location bias as a factor in CXCR3's functional selectivity.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».