MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Maternal cigarette smoking and cleft lip and palate: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021· review· en· 4 citations· W3170565777 sur OpenAlex· 10.1101/2021.06.10.21258688

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Porte sur le CanadaSon objet est le Canada, où que soient ses auteurs.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : about_only · poids de sondage : 3321.24 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Systematic review and meta-analysis used to answer an etiological question about smoking and orofacial clefts; uses a synthesis method rather than studying one.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

This systematic review answers a clinical etiological question rather than studying evidence synthesis methodology.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Uses systematic review and meta-analysis to answer a clinical etiology question; method used, method not studied.

Résumé

ABSTRACT Objectives A systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the association between active maternal smoking and cleft lip and palate etiology. Data Sources Medline, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane database from inception to November 2020. Study selection Observational studies of cigarette smoking habits in pregnant women. Outcomes included cleft lip and/or palate, cleft lip ± palate and cleft palate only. Data analysis Publication bias analyses were performed and the Newcastle Ottawa scales were used to assess study quality. Fixed or random effect models were used in the meta-analysis, dependent on risk of statistical heterogeneity. Results Forty-five studies were eligible for inclusion of which 11 were cohort and 34 were case-control studies. Sixteen studies were of sufficient standard for inclusion in the meta-analysis. The summary odds ratio for the association between smoking and cleft lip and/or palate was 1.42 (95%CI 1.27 to 1.59) with a population attributable fraction of 4% (95%CI 3% - 5%). There was limited evidence to show a dose-response effect of smoking. Conclusions This review reports a moderate association between maternal smoking and orofacial cleft but the overall quality of the conventional observational studies included was poor. There is a need for high quality and novel research strategies to further define the role of smoking in the etiology of cleft lip and palate.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
medRxiv
Thématique
Cleft Lip and Palate Research
Domaine
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Medical Research CouncilUniversity of BristolVTCT FoundationNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Mots-clés
MedicineMeta-analysisObservational studyOdds ratioEtiologyCohort studyDentistryStudy heterogeneityPopulationMEDLINEPublication biasEnvironmental healthInternal medicine
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui